-
• #16477
It's been 12 days... I suspect people might need the help. I do...
-
• #16478
Does this mean that I have to go through the flickrnightmare of trying to post another image?
-
• #16479
Helpful? -
• #16480
You know where this is. Don't you? ;-)
-
• #16481
Stand by, waiting for pics to upload....
-
• #16482
Standing by.
For the new page
A new image. -
• #16483
-
• #16484
-
• #16485
Nice one. A nice evening for it.
I took off the chains ;-) -
• #16486
Got seaweed in my cleats now too :) Used to live across the river from this and have friends who live in it.
-
• #16487
I was expecting my venture down the stairs to be significantly more precarious than it was in Sidi Dragons.
All was kushty :) -
• #16488
There's a really well-framed view of the shard around the corner from that whirlpool thing.
-
• #16489
If only there was a clue such as the name of a nearby hotel. Or some other landmark.
-
• #16490
Ha! I see what you did there.
-
• #16491
I have a couple of architectural booklets by Samantha Hardingham, called 'London'.
They deal with contemporary buildings in err..... London. The older of the two was published in '93 and contains these gems:
and
I had not long left Central St Martins. Cascades represented the future in, what was then, smash-n-grab Britain.
Compare it to that view today, when it has been dwarfed by all corporate else around it. It looks almost surreal.
Whether or not that particular style has dated gracefully isn't important (to me).
The importance of that building lay in how breathtaking and ground-breaking it was. Nothing like it had been previously seen, when it was built - certainly not in terms of private residential premises. I'll always have a soft spot for it for that reason -
• #16492
Old: Whirlpool water feature sculpture thing on the Isle of Dogs near Canary Wharf
New: Bit warm for wearing wool
-
• #16493
Not the new one, but here's the view of the Shard I was talking about
-
• #16494
Neat.
-
• #16495
Old:
William Girling Reservior, roughly nine o'clock point.New:
Kosher Auger -
• #16496
Does the tag still stand as there are no sheep in view?
-
• #16497
I was going to suggest that tagging any sheep anywhere would suffice...
-
• #16498
I am not going to suggest tagging any auger anywhere will suffice.
Enjoying tags away from roads.
-
• #16499
Old: "Hill" development on Stamford Hill. Couldn't for the life of me work out how to get to the spot where the original was taken though.
New
2 Attachments
-
• #16500
Really?
Haven't we been over this?
I'd say this is still up for grabs.Try harder dbr; it'll be more satisfying when you get it. :-)
If I show you the missing bits off the top of the building, you'll suss it straight away.
This building has water adjacent to its north elevation as well as its west elevation.
The image shows a bit of one, and most of the other.