-
• #15452
Wouldn't that cost more than the watch did?
-
• #15453
Given how inexpensive the watch was, probably. However that's not a reason not to do it, if such a bracelet exists.
-
• #15455
The case has a Ti finish, I'd not want a bracelet that didn't match.
-
• #15456
-
• #15457
Much snob, very nose in air, wow! Such brand.
Happy to use an SS bracelet if it matches.
-
• #15458
I'm only kidding... :)
Like @rardar says you might have a hard time finding something that matches your lugs... There must be something around tho', try the Seiko forums...
-
• #15459
PS Only just noticed the flats on that F0ffa... :$
-
• #15460
I hope that's not a genuine build...
-
• #15461
Yobokies does an oyster strap for Seiko lugs I think. Not sure what else he has but big on the Seiko stuff.
-
• #15462
I believe it's from their website... 💩
-
• #15463
Hmm, there's this: http://www.amazon.co.uk/22mm-Super-Oyster-SKX007-Curved/dp/B00C58S82W
Time to check what body my watch has.
-
• #15464
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.view&alt=web&id=361234093088
Huge price variability for these- how to tell a good one?
-
• #15465
These look quite interesting - something with a GMT hand is what I'm interested in:
-
• #15467
Yes, I'm hoping he'll chime in. I have read what he posted before with interest.
Everyone seems to have a Rolex - you'd think they get issued at the door with the bottle of water and Americano for some of the meetings I go to these days - so the GS wins some points simply for being "other".
-
• #15468
Do you like them though? Or are you just trying to spend a load of money on something other than a Rolex?
The Bell&Ross vintage line is really nice. Classy.
-
• #15469
When I buy something vintage which I'm not 100% familiar with, I get myself a range of photos of known-good examples, and then compare to what I'm considering buying. What you can't do is guarantee the quality of the servicing work, but generally you'll more often than not be fine.
-
• #15470
I'm very much at the research stage at the moment, I simply don't know enough about these things to do anything other than, as you put it, spend a load of money.
Also, I don't have a load of money to spend on (potentially) a watch right now.
However, I've got a minor celebration in August this year, by which time I could have put aside some cash.
It's not that I dislike the Rolex Explorer - there was a reason I was looking at them when at T5 a few days ago.
-
• #15471
Then just buy the Rolex Explorer? Its a known quantity and you like it. People don't really care what man-bracelet you wear
-
• #15472
So the default choice is always the correct one? It's a non-trivial amount of cash.
-
• #15473
If you like that GMT a I'd consider the SBGE001. You'd have Spring Drive, which is an interest in itself, gives the cool truly sweeping second hand and is something else to further justify the choice, rather than 'because everyone else already has a Rolex'.
-
• #15474
No, but if there is a lack of a pressing reason against it, why dismiss it just because its the default
-
• #15475
Just been looking at Subs again, found a really nice Tudor 7928 for £2,980 and a mint 1995 Rolex Sub for £3,210... Daft... Just window shopping anyway...
I was wondering whether there was a titanium bracelet that was designed for the Seiko.