You are reading a single comment by @Velocio and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • The pitch fork mob won't have achieved that. Yurikin would have by challenging calmly, and was assisted by ABCNews by shifting himself firmly into troll territory.

    I think that's unfair. You made the point, a couple of times, that instead of complaining to you we should address the troll directly so they have a chance to apologise / change their behaviour, and the forum can self-moderate. That's what Yurikin was doing. If ABC stays quiet, or stops trolling, surely this is the outcome we all wanted? We may come across as a pitchfork mob, but the point has been clearly made to ABC that we find him boring and he has no support here.

  • but the point has been clearly made to ABC that we find him boring and he has no support here.

    Who here doesn't find someone boring on here?

    That's a terrible criteria for demanding a ban. In raising it in here, that's what is being asked of me as it's the only reason to involve me.

    Get better criteria, build a better case.

    I'm never going to ban someone because from your extremely subjective point of view, someone bores you. Even if you multiply your to include the entire forum population, someone boring everyone (which you probably could never verify) still isn't a reason to ban... it's a reason for those who are bored to put the someone on ignore.

    Has the forum slid so much that this is honestly the best case that can be made?

    Have all my pleas for a solid reason to ban someone really fallen on deaf ears?

    If people want me to act, show me the basis on which to act. That includes showing me reasoned and calm attempts to integrate the someone in question, to get them to understand what has caused issue and how to correct it.

    When given such clear information, I act very swiftly.

  • Ok, firstly. I'm sorry for the paucity of my intellectual arguments, and based on your limited feedback I'll endeavour to do better.

    Secondly, the probable reason that the mods in the ladies forum haven't dealt with this, is simply because they're not around much. They can generally trust the entire forum to not use the ladies forum as a place for casual sexism, so don't feel the need to be here quite so much as they would if it were more hostile.

    Thirdly, the fact that this discussion is happening in here is something you're taking very personally, and I'd like to apologise for making you feel that way (this is a genuine apology, rather than the slightly passive-aggressive one in point the first). The reason (IMO) the discussion is happening here has less to do with you than it does with the fact that the ladies subforum really isn't the place for this kind of chat. It's a positive, safe space for women, and something like this will cause an avalanche of negativity in it that will leave all the women feeling a bit soiled and exhausted. I don't know how many of you read the ladies forum regularly, but of those who do, you may have noticed that there aren't ever any arguments in there - no fights, no pissing contests, no rows. The only time I can think of when there was an argument in there was when that moron tommy waded in, and even then there were ladies pleading "can we please not fight in here?" That's deliberate. It's not because ladies in general want to avoid arguments at all costs - you only need to look at me or hats to disabuse you of that idea - it's because we choose our words in there very carefully in order to avoid conflict so that the space is positive and supportive at all times.

    To have the argument in there changes this safe space into a space with a chilling effect for people who don't want to fight these attitudes all the time. That's basically the entire internet! There's one place where it doesn't need to be that way, and now our mate here has cocked it up. The alternative, to not have the argument in there, means that the safe space has changed into a space (for women!) where casual sexism goes unchallenged. Both of those options are terrible.

    VB, that's why this discussion is happening in this thread, and I don't want you to think that it's happening in here because we're all thinking "that VB! He's such a complicit dickhead and a monster". I'd be very surprised if anybody was thinking that, though I admit I'm constantly surprised at the stuff that goes on in other people's heads. Anyway, so you don't want this discussion happening here, which I understand. It feels like an attack on your diplomatic skills. It's not intended to be. Do you, in turn, see why I'm not hugely keen on this discussion happening in the "super cool women doing neat things on bikes" thread? Please don't take the location of this personally. It's not about you, it's about bro above.

  • Who here doesn't find someone boring on here?

    That's a terrible criteria for demanding a ban.>

    Yes, that was a poor / vague choice of words on my part. To clarify: sexism is boring. If fewer women use the site because of it, the site becomes more boring. If threads are derailed by trolling and discussion grinds to a halt, that's boring. I think you have found the best solution in making Bothwell and hats mods of that part of the forum, so trebles all round.

About

Avatar for Velocio @Velocio started