Of course (to your last paragraph). But a JPG of a photograph claiming to be a list of offenders does not strike me as evidence, even if there is a story that claims to explain its provenance. There are dozens of blogs about this out there spouting much craziness.
Links to news sources are a bit more convincing.
Having said all of that, that Lord Brittan guy looks seriously sketchy.
Of course (to your last paragraph). But a JPG of a photograph claiming to be a list of offenders does not strike me as evidence, even if there is a story that claims to explain its provenance. There are dozens of blogs about this out there spouting much craziness.
Links to news sources are a bit more convincing.
Having said all of that, that Lord Brittan guy looks seriously sketchy.