For Sale: codswallop ( Charlie Z Harris - crazygill85@hotmail.co.uk ) defrauding people

Have emailed him suggesting he sorts it out before he is reported for fraud. Also suggested he use his paypal account to rectify things :)

but if he gets away with it won't he just try repeat on another website ?

but if he gets away with it won't he just try repeat on another website ?

i doubt it i dont think he realised how easy it is to trace someone .....still awaiting dental records , blood group and exam results then we should have everything for the po po !

I have sent a payment request to charlie13zh@gmail.com via PayPal.

Fingers crossed...

Hmm.

Well, what do you want to know? Do you want to know all the files in your home directory?

Can you access my webcam? How many fingers?

Bloody hell this mess just gets bigger and bigger...

make sure warnings are posted in the relevant threads

Are you sure? In which posts does Codswallop/Charlie use that number or the name Mantas? I couldn't find any by searching.

That's a message from Mantas (mantovelo) to Codswallop.

tommmmmmm you're right, removed post to not falsely slander.

good idea tommmmmm , what happens when he dont respond to paypal ?

I have sent a payment request to charlie13zh@gmail.com via PayPal.

Fingers crossed...

Hmm.

interesting thread.... so apart from gios78 accusing me of being codswallop (nice move) and codswallop ripping people off i wondered why buyers didn't pay by paypal goods?

john nettles sorry
when did i accuse you , sincere apologies if i did !
i found a thread that you responded to a question for codswallop , and seemed to have the answer sorry didnt "accuse" merely asked was trying to track him down and to find out who and when people had actually bought what when where and how etc etc . nobody is accusing you of anything

they didnt buy via paypal cos his other threads looked legit and thats what i was trying to track .....so far i only found one person who said they bought something from him ....

No worries - it was on my for sale thread - you probably asked if i was codswallop as opposed to accuse so apologies too.
So , no -i'm not him. I did PM him about buying something (can't remember what) but it "had sold".
Hope people get their dosh back.
cheers J

was this and you can see why sorry :

johnnettles
Quote:
Originally Posted by gios78
paging codswallop .....hes disappeared ?
Apologies - haven't checked on the site for a while - going through the housebuying process so a bit distracted!

will check pm's now and respond

cheers

FIZIK SOLD by the way

If even Bergerac can't find the guy...

jersey was a hotbed of criminal activity back then now its just money laundering

If even Bergerac can't find the guy...

:)
i'll pop down the bureau des étrangers and see what i can do...

Ba Ba baaaaaaa...

Another route is to inform his bank that the account is potentially being used to facilitate fraudulent activity.

good idea tommmmmm , what happens when he dont respond to paypal ?

tommmmmmm you're right, removed post to not falsely slander.

Slander is verbal, if the comment is written it is a libel :)

Another route is to inform his bank that the account is potentially being used to facilitate fraudulent activity.

He was planning on selling me the R1 stem, but I couldn't get the info I needed from him.
Here's what he sent me:

Account, Sort Code, IBAN, BIC and...
Branch address: 25 High Street Colchester Essex CO1 1DG

Slander is verbal, if the comment is written it is a libel :)
That depends on whether the subject of the comment is engaged in the online conversation.

[Bulletin board posts] are rather like contributions to a casual conversation (the analogy sometimes being drawn with people chatting in a bar) which people simply note before moving on; they are often uninhibited, casual and ill thought out. Those who participate know this and expect a certain amount of repartee or 'give and take'.

When considered in the context of defamation law, therefore, communications of this kind are much more akin to slanders (this cause of action being nowadays relatively rare) than to the usual, more permanent kind of communications found in libel actions. People do not often take a 'thread' and go through it as a whole like a newspaper article. They tend to read the remarks, make their own contributions if they feel inclined, and think no more about it.

IANAL, however, and it's probably best to avoid any defamatory / actionable comments.