-
• #577
Mmm wireless. Much hot, so want.
Is wireless braking actually a possibility for the future? Car's have fly by wire systems so maybe it's not such a ridiculous idea. Although the notion of running out of battery mid descent could be interesting.
No. No car has FBW brakes. The failure modes are horrible, there is no safe way of dealing with battery problems, and the forces involved would require enormous batteries. Not going to happen.
And so long as we still have brake cables, the benefits of wireless gears seem rather marginal to me. If you're keeping the brake cables then attaching a single electronic gear cable to one of them seems less than onerous. Probably won't stop me from getting an eRed groupset once it comes out though...
-
• #579
Wireless shifting is fine, but braking? Surly not... You would loose the sense of modulation and wouldn't be worth the weight saved.
-
• #580
so SRAM wireless...
we're going to have to charge 4 batteries and have 4 potential different points of failure while out riding?
-
• #581
they will be wirelessly charged too
-
• #582
Apparently, Garmin is working on electronic steering - it follows your route, so you don't have to worry.
-
• #583
I look forward to electronic motors. Wasn't Cancellara testing one out a few seasons ago?
-
• #584
Sram electronic...
http://velonews.competitor.com/2014/05/gallery/spotted-sram-electronic-drivetrain_327147They can use electronics to compensate for their weak as piss deraillers.
-
• #585
Good move by SRAM. Wireless was the logical next step and it looks like they're ahead of both Shimano and Campagnolo.
If it works. They don't have a good track record with groupset debuts.
-
• #586
Shimano had to make everything for the first gen Di2, the second gen stuff and EPS use commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) actuators/etc.
I would imagine that SRAM is buying in all that stuff, which both introduces and removes a risk of failure, as it were.
-
• #587
They still have to rememeber to have enough metal in the cages to actually move the chain, regardless of what electronic voodoo is behind the scenes.
-
• #588
so SRAM wireless...
we're going to have to charge 4 batteries and have 4 potential different points of failure while out riding?
When was the last time you had a battery fail?
-
• #589
by fail I mean run out of charge
and so... every day on my phone?
-
• #590
You do realise electronic groupsets have a >1000mi battery life, don't you? You'd have to be an idiot to run out.
-
• #591
yes but it has been known to happen, and presumably likelier with four batteries needing charged. probably not an issue as long as the charging is simultaneous
-
• #592
Only two batteries will need regular charging, and you presumably have the benefit that if the rear fails you can use the battery from the front
-
• #593
Only two batteries will need regular charging, and you presumably have the benefit that if the rear fails you can use the battery from the front
That would be smart
-
• #594
You do realise electronic groupsets have a >1000mi battery life, don't you? You'd have to be an idiot to run out.
It does happen - I've seen it first hand several times.
-
• #595
You do realise electronic groupsets have a >1000mi battery life, don't you? You'd have to be an idiot to run out.
Up to 1,000 miles? really? if that were the case, then it might explain why some people with Di2 end up DNF long audax ride.
-
• #596
Where were you in maths Ed?
">" does not mean "up to" it means "greater than", ie. "at least".
-
• #597
Di2 test: http://blog.tri-sports.com/2011/04/25/shimano-di2-battery-life-after-death/
Obviously depends on how often you change gears.
-
• #598
Meh. You need to remember to charge Your garmin every 20 hrs anyway. Otherwise why ride?
-
• #599
XTR Di2 with sequential shifting about to be officially announced.
yes...
your logic is commendable. i only really meant that from a visual point of view, it could well go there.