-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The current government, at least, will never do this because it would never undermine the interests of those who already own or have 'banked' prime land. This is the real story behind much of the 'housing crisis'. Given a sort-of-airing here:
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/sep/02/britain-farmland-tax-haven-reform
-
-
-
-
Councils are not empowered (and don't currently have the expertise) to develop land
I'd suspect they will never get that expertise back - they're now dependant on consultancy for most of the things the Borough Architects and their associated offices used to do. The skills aren't there.
scrape some of the profit from private developments in the form of S106, or CIL... although this can be lessened with accountancy tricks
There are of course people who make quite a good living arguing down s106 contributions, affordable housing elements, etc. They're well worth their fee, if you're a developer. The public sector no longer has the cash or appetite to argue with them.
Some leaders of local councils have awkward ties to developers. Or developers can always go above the head of the local council and involve the government, or mayor of London.
You see lots of former councillors who start hawking themselves round offering 'services' to property firms. Professionally they are generally as clueless as you might expect but are sometimes useful for getting the current planning committee on side. The biggest problem of all of course is that no council these days has the taste to fight a potentially expensive appeal.
If the above sounds a bit depressing then, well, it is. Very easy to be nostalgic about some of the things achieved 50 or so years back.
-
Another donation, I'll share too.