-
That's a good tip, thanks. At the moment, I'm advancing the pistons a tiny bit without wheel in bike, to get the pads a bit closer to the rotors. But when pads wear, distance get tiny bit bigger and I have to re-advance the pistons a bit all over and over again.
Am I correct that with overfilling, I get the same result, but with the difference that distance between pad and rotor will remain the same regardless of pad wear?
-
-
-
-
-
Yes, the return is fine. Also, it's been like this since new. Is it normal that they work better / worse with different reach positions? When I put the lever in the most extreme position (away from bars) it even puts the pistons out so much that brake pads clamp the rotor. On another bike i have campa record, don't think brake performance is affected when changing reach.
@snottyotter seriously considering that tbh if I cant solve this
-
I'm almost losing my nerves on a Sram Rival (mech) Hydr brake system, where I don't find a good solution for. Tried all tricks I new, but still not 100% OK with brake function. Is there a magic trick that I don't know about, or do I have to accept that Sram Rival hydraulic braking is shit compared to Campagnolo and Shimano? Calipers are non-bleeding edge, post mount calipers.
Problem: depending on the reach adjustment of the lever (with the 2.5mm grub screw under the lever), the bite point changes. If a adjust the reach relatively close to the bars (where I want the levers to be) there occurs some +- 2cm of free travel, before any braking action occurs. This just feels shit when riding. When I adjust the reach further away of the bars, in a more extreme position, this free travel seems to be less. At that position, the braking feels like I want it to feel. Fast, not numb, as if you're in control without a 2 cm lag witch each brake action. But lever is not reachable because of the extreme position. What I want is this braking, but with a shorter reach.
Effective braking power is ok. It's all about the free stroke / travel of the lever that I want to avoid. With Shimano/Campagnolo hydraulics, I've sometimes solved this by pressurizing the system just a little by pressing the syringes while closing the brake port. But these Sram non-bleeding edge f*ckers don't have a brake port it seems.
What I've tried:
- multiple bleeds, following the exact instructions from Sram manual (last time with lever reach as close to bars as possible)
- removing wheel, pressing levers a bit to get the brake pads closer to the rotors => makes it a bit better, but not enough
- new brake pads /rotors
- ...
Eternal gratitude for who can help here :)
- multiple bleeds, following the exact instructions from Sram manual (last time with lever reach as close to bars as possible)
-
-
Sooooo, almost 7 years have passed after acquiring a rusty and old Faggin bike. At that moment, almost ready for the skip. Happy to finish this slow burner this week.
Almost complete Cambio Rino group including pedals & toeclips and a nice alu headset. Modolo Corsa brakes, Concor saddle & Ambrosio rims. 3ttt cockpit. DIY paintjob.
Before , as I got the bike:
-
-
Check J&L seatposts. I bought one on EBay some years ago. Looks good, but clamping mechanism is sh*t. Same issue as @kndl describes.
Suitable for 7*9 and with setback/no setback though.
-
-
Sooooo... Nearly 3 years after respraying the Faggin (see pg 2), It's finally time to build. I ended up collecting a nearly full Cambio Rino group. Not the most common or known brand but a nice relief from all the Campagnolo SR bikes out there. More info on Cambio Rino: https://www.disraeligears.co.uk/site/rino_derailleurs.html. Why Rino? Because the original seatpost was Rino. I acquired some Rino downtube shifters after refinishing the frame. Than, 2 years passed where nothing happened. Than, by accident I scored a very nice Rino crankset. That was the trigger to gather a nearly full group (BB, cranks, pedals, clips, hubs, seatpost, shifters, Crono derailleurs, headset). Only brakes and levers will be Modolo.
I've already build the wheelset around a nice black pair of Rino hubs, with Ambrosio rims.
Slowly, but I'll get there in the end...
-
That is a brilliant frameset - this is going to be an excellent build. You've probably already forgotten about the waiting time by now.
About the stem: just my humble opinion, but normal ahead stems can look good on a vintage/retro frame. It looks great when the angle of the stem puts its parallel with the toptube. For a horizontal top tube, you'll need a -17 (more or less) stem for this. Also, a minium of spacers helps. The negative part: this puts you in a quite aggressive position. And if a bike doesn't fit, you're never gonna love it.
You should also not underestimate the impact that bars / position of shifters on bars have on the relative height / position of your shifters (where your hands will be most). From experience, switching bars can easily affect the height with a coupe of cm. Check BDHU topic ;)
But whatever you decide, it's your bike. And its going to be a beauty!
-
-
-
@Gaston this kind of work makes me happy, this is what it's all about for me. Great work, keep on posting
-
The only good thing about waiting very long for a timeless classic, is that it will always be a timeless classic.
Keep my fingers crossed for you @Retro_Bastard
-
Correct. It's a 61cc and looks quite big with the horizontale headtube. My gravel bike has +- the same headtube length as they master (20,5cm) but a sloping tt and you wouldn't say it's extremely big bike. I'm 1,87m myself, big, but not a giant either right :)
But in those bigger sizes, you'll often find the masters in freuler geometry. And to me, that's the bike equivalent of a Fiat Multipla.
-
Le Coffee Ride in Coo has a great collection of rides in the Ardennes : https://www.lecoffeeride.cc/rides/.