Search results for:

http://www.fixiesupermarket.com/1-Chrome-Cr-Mo-Silver-Road-Bike-Fork-Threaded-700c-P3299740.aspx

In the interests of not creating any further discomfort to H2O - post and bolded type removed.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/2014/feb/25/internet-trolls-are-also-real-life-trolls

Food for thought

[edit:Velocio]Quoting 95% of an article is not an excerpt, and links work perfectly well.[/edit]

I see it is still quiet here, a simple change replacing one character in the thread title, removes the post from the front page of google .
Amazing !!

Are we being taken for mugs here ??

Cynically, I suspect Dani has been quietly asking google to remove entries under the "right to be forgotten" rule.
Is this is a big sanitising exercise for Foffa - he must need to look cleaner to gain a deal in Europe?

Sorry don't get it
Humour ?
Irony ?

Skint ?

would there be any objections to starting a thread to ask for donations to NAPAC ?
National Association for People Abused in Childhood
This link
https://www.justgiving.com/napac/donate/

Looks like Wiki deleted the Foffa entry

Westminster paedophile network allegations.
Leon Brittan loses dossier.
Trying to bury some bad news under wrong'un Rolf?

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/jul/02/lord-brittan-1980s-dossier-sex-abuse-claims

There have been long standing allegations that the ex-minister is a child raping nonce himself.

Towels ? Softener?? Rough??? Smooth ????
Chem Trails ........................ WTF?

All gone now - nothing to see here

Yes

I don't think it's prohibited for the subject of an article to prompt its creation, but they have to butt out after that.

Got it now, Thank you MDCC, I was just finding the references to the banning of Dani Foffa from posting to wiki a tad confusing.

Re-reading the posts relating to the Wiki entry, am I right in assuming that the original article was published by Tyson Sadlo and Dani Foffa or under their specific instruction with their full editorial direction and control?

Am I wrong to assume that this is wholeheartedly against the principles of Wikimedia/Wikipedia?

There is a conscientious editor undoing Dannii's revisions every time he makes them. Dannii doesn't yet seem to understand that a Wikipedia article about him is not his to edit, and he keeps logging in from new addresses as fast as he gets banned and blocked.

Well done to the "conscientious" editor !! wink wink

stanley tucci aicmfp.

Close, but no cigar, Greenhell

'fraid the £5 is not coming your way today

Danni Foffa ??

It's nice to give a little pleasure :-)

'tis a WICKED pleasure

Gone

On the subject of editing

Afterthought

http://foffabikes.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foffa_Bikes

Any of these on here?

LOL check out the Wiki entry

Self-edited you say...

OMG ........................ Priceless !!

Edited
The only troll looking for this entry would be - Dancing James

All we really know is that he's a bit stupid.

Only a "bit" stupid ?? you are too generous