-
-
-
My dunce mind is slowly figuring this out. So if I want to be completely honest, which I do, I could keep the beater going and ride to work on that, keep the shiny new carbon at the studio and use that for meetings and work related travel, and then claim 70% of it back.
Or setup the cycle to work scheme for my company, which is apparently possible but more of a admin-ball-ache I imagine.
no. if you have two bikes, and only used the new one on freelance work you'd claim 100%. It's based on use of that one bike.
you have to justify it. think like this. if you had a car, you'd not get away with a second car unless it was very different use, a van would be very different.
-
-
So if I'm using the bike on a daily basis for meetings etc 5 days a week, and riding it 1-2 days over the weekend for fun, does claiming a 3rd of it still make sense?
no. that's 70% if you only ride on 5 days for nothing but meetings.
just calculate how much of the bike use if for self-employed work.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Have they released the info on how much money Barclays has actually paid towards the scheme yet?
£25m. The scheme set up being total £140m
-
Absolutely agree that there's an absolute fuck-ton of better things for coppers to be doing.
I can imagine that the collection and administration of said fines probably takes up a lion share of the amount collected once it's been seen through to completion.
I agree with the sentiment they could be busting rapists and other nobs, but how are the Police to respond to public calls for crackdown on dangerous cyclists? When people ask what the met are doing, they can produce a list of enforcement areas and figures on fines.
They also do boring stuff like this when they've got no intel on drug dealers and robbers to act on.
The full economic cost, if you consider all costs beyond the plod standing there (radio system, control centre, admin staff, office buildings, tea and biscuits, paperwork, archives, computer systems, pensions, NI... list is rather endless), will be far outweighed by any return from fines.
-
-
-
grey F. Moser for sale £400, located in Berlin, can transport to Birmingham end-September. Will sell for €400 if collected in Berlin.
Frame / Size / Year:
F. Moser [unknown], Oria ML25 molibdemo mannesmann tubing / 21" / [unknown]Handlebars / Stem:
3ttt mod competizone / 3ttt F.MoserFork / Headset:
Slisi Oria ML25 / Shimano HP-500Front Wheel / Hub / Rim / Tire:
Shimano Santé / Ambrosio 19 extra élite / Michelin Krylion CarbonRear Wheel / Hub / Rim / Tire:
Shimano Santé / Ambrosio 19 extra élite / Michelin Krylion CarbonCrankset / Bottom Bracket:
Shimano Santé, Shimano Biopace (52+42) / ShimanoSaddle / Seat Post:
Campana / CampagnoloPedals / Chain:
[none] / SedisShifters / Derailers:
Shimano Santé / Shimano SantéBrakes / Brake Levers:
Shimano Santé / Shimano SantéGearing / Chainring / Misc.:
Shimano Biopace 52+42 chain rings, 7 hub -
-
-
-
-
-
What? Get off the road.
Totally nuts to endanger yourself and others for the sake of carrying a few spare AA.
Any idea how invisible a bike without lights is in the dark? Cars and peds can't see you. Not everyone has perfect eyesight. Oncoming traffic makes it harder to see dark bikes. I've driven up behind riders and not spotted them until less than 10 metres - you really want that risk? And coming out of a side road? or being undertaken? I will not see you.
No lights, and any accident will automatically and always be the rider's fault. Hit a ped and it might end up as assault with weapon.
The idiots with only helmet mounted lights are just as bad (illegal btw), when they are looking around, might as well have no lights.
And remember to tip your super-bright lights about 5 degree below the horizontal, or they are just dazzling everyone and that is bad for the rider too.