-
-
-
-
-
-
From what I've seen from the collective comments, I'm sorry for what I've said as it's clear I took things the wrong way and certainly started off on the wrong foot. I can see that now. I didn't mean to be insensitive but especially how I entered the conversation I understand how it was seen that way.
-
-
I didn't understand the harm and apologised. I'm now tryna move on but keep getting dragged back to this thread. I have apologised and said I will no longer comment on the topic in case I do more harm. I was simply asking questions cos I'm new here. If I put it in a way that was offensive I'm sorry, I clearly didn't have the understanding that other members do. Therefore I'll keep my ideals to myself and focus on my cycling. I can't undo things, I can only try to resolve them or apologise.
-
-
-
If I can't apologise and you're gonna keep nitpicking everything I say then clearly you're no better than me. I did not put it on the same level I got told I was "invoking the persecution of trans people" which I would never aim to do. Therefore I felt the need to defend the fact that I have no problem with how people present themselves as it doesn't affect me. I'm trying to give an apology and you still want me to just say I'm insensitive. In the name of harm reduction you're no good at explaining to people and may be the very reason some people are against it. I like to have a healthy conversation that is constructive so I can take something away from it. Hence why I'm not trying to insult anyone, while you're trying to say I have a "crassly stupid insensitivity". I hope everyone has a great night and once again apologies for any wrongdoings or things I have said.
-
-
I agree with you it's the people that count, hence me questioning why it matters what pronouns you give an inanimate object that you own. If this is how discussions go down on this forum then I'll stick to bikes and keep my questions to myself. I was simply asking where the issue lies. My apologies.
-
-
-
-
Well you've made the assumption that it "reveals something less admirable". Even saying it's sometimes is admitting that it's not always in bad interest. Instead of telling everyone that pronouning their bikes is wrong, perhaps put more focus on the people that are doing it with ill intent. I thought the whole reason you called a bike she is because it personifies it and in my experience makes me look after my bike more, as I notice it looks after me. I'm all for everyone being who they are but this seems like a very strawman argument about something that isn't harming anyone. I thought the main purpose of your way of thinking is risk prevention
-
-
-
-
-
Is that a flip flop hub? I'm looking for a fixed gear for a friend