-
It's hard to write anything that doesn't sound disingenous when you're replying to someone on the internet that you don't know. But what you describe sounds harder than I can imagine and I'm so sorry that you're going through it.
However you're doing, we're grateful for the thread and your quest for cat-based bike adventures! Please give her a belly rub from us :)
-
-
-
-
What's your 3D print material, is it Markforged? If you have access to this kind of material you probably know this already but lots of the carbon fiber reinforced materials out there are nylon based, which means they swell and weaken with moisture. Conformal coating/paint does a good job of stopping this.
Not trying to be mansplain-y, just speaking from the experience of having printed bike parts fail and not wanting to see you need a face transplant!
-
slightly off topic but does anyone know what the status of Low is atm? Seems like they're not making bikes and there's no indication of when they'll start again, I couldn't find anything online. Its a shame because they make stunning frames and in the back of my mind I always wanted one if I ever got rich and had big money to spend on a sick fixeh
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I think you're talking about a patent. My understanding is that you can only apply for a patent before your idea becomes public knowledge, because after that point it's essentially a "free" idea at nobody can claim ownership of.
Patenting something is also fairly time consuming and expensive, and they expire after a while. So as a private individual it's only really worth pursuing if you think your idea is going to make bank.
This is super cool btw!
-
-
-
-
-
-
I don't want to be one of those naysayers (this whole thing is bonkers and I love your attitude towards this), but 2-3 mm tent poles in carbon might be awful.
Off the top of my head tent poles tend to be in the 10+ mm region. Stiffness scales a lot with diameter, so a 2 mm pole is going to be orders of magnitude less stiff than a more standard size
-
What you say makes sense, but that's kind of the problem. You're making a very sensible interpretation of how this should play out given how the law is described, but it's the ambiguity in the wording that gives cause for concern.
My financial security being dependent on the common sense of a room full of strangers would personally be extremely anxiety inducing.