Search results for:

So we tweaked the geometry a bit (head angle now 71,5 degrees and fork rake 50 mm) and managed to stretch front-center by 10 millimeters with only -2 mm change in trail. Looks like that solved the toe overlap problem.

It’s now down to two decisions:
1) 31,7 vs 35 mm down tube
2) head tube vs. down tube cable guides

Is a smaller diameter tube more resistant to dings even with similar wall thickness? Would a 35 mm down tube on a bike like this be an overkill for a 75 kg rider and add excessive stiffness?

Head tube cable guides look nicer in my opinion. Is there a practical reason to choose them over down tube guides or vice versa?

@Pawlus this is exactly what I have in mind!

Some have suggested a 50 mm rake fork in exchange for a bit more toe clearance. I believe it’s doable but in that case trail would be less than 60. If I’ve understood correctly 57 is supposed to be the neutral amount of trail. For some reason a large portion of adventure/gravel/do-it-all bikes have about 65 mm trail. If more trail equals better high speed stability why do so many bikes in this segment (Genesis CdF, Shand Stooshie and Stoater, Mason Bokeh etc.) have such high trail even though they are perhaps otherwise more suited to medium speed riding duties?

Thanks for all the comments so far! I always forget to mention some critical details. @Alb it’s going to have a 1x setup at least for time being so no need to worry about front derailleur clearance.

As you can see from the geometry drawing the toe overlap problem only exists when mudguards are used. Also my current bike has less clearance and I can’t remember it causing any trouble even at slow speeds. Perhaps the wild tarck bike years weren’t for nothing after all... It may also be that I’m just justifying my bad decisions and bike designing skills but what the heck. Frankly it seems that similar frames and bikes in my size usually have front-center measurements between 595 and 610 mm so it’s not all that bad after all. What I’m more concerned is if 430-600-65 (cs-fc-trail) lead to a potentially balanced ride and steering.

There’s a 55 mm wide MAX fork crown available. That leaves about one centimeter on each side between tyre and fork leg depending on the exact tyre width.

Chainstay is actually 430 but Mr R has marked it incorrectly. I’m planning to use Ortlieb Sport Roller City panniers which are supposed to be quite compact. Should have enough clearance at the back.

Hi all!

I started a new project some months ago with the intention of building myself a bike that could take me to gravel roads, occasional century rides and light touring. After a thorough investigation of today's frameset market I came to a conclusion that of all the candidates none would tick all my boxes. What to do? Go custom. I've been in touch with Tomasz Rychtarski changing ideas back and forth, presenting requirements and now it looks like all the major details have been discussed and decided upon. Before I go full custom I wanted to hear your opinion about the decisions we've made just to check if everything makes sense also to the big public.

I'd like the riding position to be quite relaxed and the bike itself to be responsive and fun but also predictable enough at the same time. The bike is supposed to have tyre clearance for 35-40 mm tyres with mudguards and also mounts for rear and front racks. Tubing is going to be Columbus Zona with a MAX fork. Disc brakes are of course nice! I've thought about full internal cable routing - any thoughts?

Tomasz was concerned about sufficient toe clearance with mudguards (front-center 599 mm). I've spent more time wondering about balance between front and rear ends. How do suggested chainstay length and trail for example work together? I really don't want either end to ride or act in a completely different way.

Finally here's the planned geometry. The guy is supposed to be me and have my body measurements.

Up

Looks like the new Equilibrium Disc has a fair amount of tyre clearance up front. Wonder if the rear end still takes more than 28 c with and without guards as stated by Genesis when I asked them about it a few weeks ago.

Looking for a frameset or frame only with following specs:
-size medium/54-56
-clearance for 35 mm tyres
-disc brake, mudguard and rear rack mounts
-good structural condition

I'm based in Finland so needs to be shipped but I will of course cover the expenses.

Regards,
Antti

Hop

Same ol' needs

Thanks for the offer @Alc but I already have a steel frame.

Ups

Still looking

Size corrected. It's a 56 I'm after, not a 54.

In 2012 they began to produce it with the curved top tube I think.

Looking for a Langster frameset (2012 or newer) in size 56. Don't mind if it has paint chips or other cosmetic blemishes but dents are a turn off in this case.

I'm located in Finland so shipping is a must but I will of course cover all fees. Thanks!

Thank you @tomsvoboda. Great frames but just a bit off my target.

Also edited my ad a bit. If you have a frame with a slightly sloping top tube, I'm open to offers. Otherwise earlier criteria applies.

Time for a new project. I need a steel track frame of approximately following kind:
-classic track geometry preferred but I could also consider moderate pursuit geometry
-seat tube 55 c-c, top tube 55 c-c
-preferably not drilled for brakes
-threaded 1" fork
-no dents or other structural damage, little signs of life are ok though
(Almost) any color will do and I don't mind if it's British or Italian threaded.

PM please.

P.S. As mentioned earlier in this thread, I'm based in Finland but will cover all shipping fees.

Seems legit.

Third dibs on the Raleigh.
e: That dent was a turn off. Cancel dibs.

It's nearly time for winter bikes here in Finland but I'm still longing for a lo pro project. Help me out, please.

Thanks for everybody's contribution but no luck so far. The search goes on!

@bikepedaler Could you send me a PM with price requests and perhaps some photos?

Old needs fulfilled, now looking for a frameset with following specs:
-pursuit or lo pro geometry
-suitable for me (178 cm/5'10")
-horizontal dropouts or track ends
-steel frame
-not super expensive

Please note that the frameset would have to get to Finland one way or another. Naturally I'll cover all costs. Cheers!

Could it be the Italian bottom bracket shell?