-
-
-
-
-
-
> I'd love a fast, super light, carbon, short travel, full sus, xc 29er (trek top fuel 9.7 for example). But my head tells me I should go for something with a bit more travel (trek fuel ex 9.8, if we're staying with the same brand). Both 29er, both carbon, but 100mm vs 130mm. I like xc racing but let's be honest, I'm not at a level where the extra weight of 30mm more travel will be the difference between winning and losing races...am I best off getting a "trail" bike
May not make you win but you may pick up some places. Thats a serious amount of racing - enough to use the best you can. Your heart is right!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Read some bad feedback on the new Addex Schwalbe Thunderburts - big wobbles from deformed carcasses etc.
Ordered my favourite Racing Ralph instead and..... wobble from new. All the hassle of mounting it tubeless and now its take it off, clean it up, pack it up and send back. Probably CBA but its likely the last stupidly named tyre I buy. -
-
-
-
Been doing some N. Herts bridleways, lots of gravel, some dried mud. After 2 weeks I had to rest my butt on pure road yesterday.
And thats on a 29er, 100mm fork with 2.2s and spinning out on 34:11
How anyone can ride one of these (relatively) skinny tyred drop bar rigid bikes at speed on this stuff is beyond me.
-
-
-
@umop3pisdn has your brief sorted with his Singular.
I do 90% of my riding and racing on the Niner equivalent but with 100mm forks. Can't see the point in FS for SDW and Swinley unless you're going to be doing very long rides.
-
Cant work in GI whats the teeth?
Did some checking - 32:17? On a loaded bike that's pretty heroic!