-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Oh I’ve cycled past that (Here). The front is a little odd having basically no windows. The rest is lovely though.
-
-
-
-
Yeah, it’s depressing. There’s talk of more distribution centres opening in the area too so it’ll be chock full of HGVs. Which when looking at the plans seems like it was the whole point of the project anyway, and that’s on top of private vehicles.
For a spot that’s in desperate need of a public transport connection across the river, it’s the worst possible outcome.
-
-
-
-
-
They did for an extra shock absorber, £80 extra, but that was on top of the price above…
I’m totally confused to be honest. The only response I got when questioning it was “well the parts for your car were expensive” and reiterating multiple times that “that’s the labour price, and that’s what the parts cost” while pointing at the invoice.
Yeah, no shit, I can read that, but it’s not what you promised is it?
-
-
-
I want to write to my MP, but do we have a specific amendment we want to suggest to the bill/enforcement guidelines to make contacting representatives as effective as we can?
Only thing I can think of is a carve out for sites under a certain size. Anyone have any better ideas?