-
-
-
-
-
Taken on iPhone 4. No faffing - straight out the camera.
Link to original: http://www.flickr.com/photos/earljenx/4891892392/sizes/o/in/set-72157624724457120/ -
-
-
-
-
If using just one lock, then I'd suggest the M18. You can lock more of your bike with that (wheel and frame to immovable object). I'm not edscoble, but the physics of locking a bike securely is not a very changeable thing.
On another note, I noticed a bike a few years ago, that was extremely well locked up, and am now going to post the image. Just an idea, but if any of you see a bike that is really securely locked, front and back, and happen to take a photo, why not post it here. It works as a counterpoint to the How Not To Lock Your Bike thread.
Complete with Sainsbury's bag on saddle. Full marks.
-
-
-
-
-
If it were a 6' rugby player built like a brick shit house would you have belted him?
Not that I disagree with what you're saying, but it's kinda easy to turn around and belt a kid, but that perhaps isn't the right reaction.
Hitting a kid is not the right thing to do but in Regals defense I would have really seen red if that was my partner.
I pretty good at keeping my cool and walking away (if I can) in road rage incidents. An eye for an eye and all that...
-
Who is the wanker here? The cyclist - Not only was he riding like a dick, but he should have been able to anticipate the man stepping out and only looking in the direction of traffic flow, as it's one way road - the fact that he wasn't using the 'crosswalk' is inconsequential, as even if it had been on one the cyclist would most likely still have hit him
Yup, agreed.
-
Whose the wanker here?
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ghs3Cr2gWTQ&feature=player_embedded"]YouTube-
Old Man Gets Hit By A Bike(Raw Video)[/ame] -
-
-
-
-
-
-
intended purpose... Mtbing?