-
-
-
-
-
So we have a guy with 4Oyrs frame building experience [...]against people who most probably have exactly 4Oyrs LESS frame building experience than him
The faster an industry moves, the less value experience has. I graduated two years ago and know more about some of the programming tech we use here than some of the 20+ years experienced contractors.
I'm not saying there definitely is no benefit to what he's done but what I am saying is
- I've seen no evidence for his claims.
- I think his ideas make changes too subtle for any useful benefit
- If his bikes have won so many records, big bike firms with R&D departments will have investigated and tested the ideas and we'd have seen similar concepts by now if they were any good.
- I've seen no evidence for his claims.
-
-
-
if you were running 700c you'd have 64mm trail which would be perfect! Post your bike..
Oz @ LO
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-cfm1k7xGyJI/TjXwOLVpKdI/AAAAAAAAALU/0vKN0ek4cdM/s912/photo.jpgOz @ Brizzle
http://www.iseepeople.co.uk/bristolpolo/index_2.html -
-
-
..while cleaning spam out of the blog site I found a comment from a forum member that was "critical" (my word) of the holes and no clue about the eccentric... Sorry I presumed it would like back to that post.. an indication of the little time i spend doing computer housekeeping duties.. ;~) The picture just posted is the frame in question..which, BTW set a women's Kilo record the first time it was used..
daveI don't believe your theory about the holes uless you can show FEA work on the strength difference.
Also, I don't think any benefits would be enough to counteract the additional drag and ugliness.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Any mods fancy splitting off our discussion of metallic snake oil into a separate thread. Even the original photo didn't deserve to be in this thread.