-
Pretty proud of this one I got of her on saturday.
Although I'm lucky it came out, I had the camera set to ISO 400 from the previous roll and put a roll of Portra 160 in, so when I thought it was telling me I'd have a good exposure it should have been really far under
I think the fact that she is wearing a black t shirt has thrown the centre weighted meter off in my favour though.
Still a sloppy mistake on my part though
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Fuck's sake.
We've discovered that nearly the entire population of the meme thread have OCD and like slotting their foodstuffs and other objects into sufficiently accommodating holes.
I would venture that you should all just try and get laid more and stop jizzing on your cookie just because it fits on your coffee lid.
I found a lady that feels exactly the same way about fitting objects into sufficiently accommodating holes, if you know what I mean.
O-C-Deal with it.
-
-
-
https://24.media.tumblr.com/4ebcd9a4fa284c7d0deaee15bf2919cf/tumblr_n5b8v15wZt1r2we82o1_1280.jpg
You can just change the number at the end usually and get the bigger copy up
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
My grandfather passed away a couple of weeks ago, so I've been going through pictures in preparation for his funeral.
Really glad to have taken the time to shoot a few portraits with him while I had the chance.
Not the greatest picture ever taken, but I thought it was worth sharing.
From my first ever roll of 120 (Portra 400) with a Pentax 645
-
-
-
Feeling a bit stupid at only just discovering this, but apparently the Nikon D7000 has a back focusing problem that can be adjusted with AF fine tuning
I'm going to have a play when i get home tonight, i was just wondering if anyone else has had any experience with this and if they got noticeably good results.
I'm still not convinced that I don't just have untrustworthy eyes
I made up a contact sheet from the scans for shits-n-giggles
Its the 75mm 2.8 that came with my Pentax 645, I haven't got anything else for it for now