-
-
Ok, poll set up: http://www.lfgss.com/thread92657.html
Let's vote!
-
Quick recap on the reason for this poll:
I questioned if we really need ‘ladies’ on the jersey… when we could have ‘women’.
I’ve been doing archival research into 'the bike, the bloomer and the female cyclist in late 19th century Britain'*. Basically to cut it short, it tells a pretty awesome story of the fight women had to escape the domestic sphere, ride safely (ie. bloomers etc) and challenge draconian Victorian ideals of femininity. Remember this was a time when exercise (as well as education) was viewed as compromising a woman’s health and her potential to reproduce!
Despite winning many of the freedoms we appreciate today, a number of social restrictions of the time transferred to women on bikes - ie. the construction of 'the lady cyclist’ - with much pressure to appear ‘graceful’, ‘becoming’, ‘neat’, ‘sensible’, ‘charming’, ‘dignified’, ‘modest’, (while a discourse of heroism linked men and cycling with ‘speed’, ‘agility’, ‘performance’, ‘champion’, ‘professional’ ‘skill’ etc).
My argument is that vestiges of ‘the lady cyclist’ continue today to shape (and limit) who women can be on bikes. How often do we growl about the broad marketing categories of Men’s bikes/cycling (serious, expensive) and Ladies’ bikes/cycling (bit flowery, lower end) etc etc.
So, my point is, sure, some of us are ladies (sometimes) but we are so much more : )
This is a chance (using scoot's awesome design) to represent amazing women who cycle.
- www.cyclingcultures.org.uk
- www.cyclingcultures.org.uk
-
-
Just to clarify, I don't have an issue with a gender specific jersey (as I agree, this started as a jersey for our specific corner of the forum). And I think the design is top banana. I just had some wobbles about the use of the term 'ladies' and I wanted to hear other people's views on it. I was suggesting 'women' would work just as well and possibly carry less baggage.
-
Are you still looking for bike stories?
Yes please, we'll be drawing this data for years yet! : )
@skydancer - a poll is a great idea.
-
@missmouse - Thanks for your positive feedback on the site. It was a great project to be involved in. There will be much more stuff available as things get published from the research such as piece I did to deconstruct 'the ipod cycling zombie' (alas, academia is not a quick publishing discipline). Your colleagues were probably at today's Cycling and Society Conference at UEL....? I had a poster of this new pilot project ^ which is why it became all a bit top of mind again.
@hoefla - Liking your suggestions and completely agree that there shouldn't be two versions (ladies and other). I'll take a dig through the archives for past debates.
-
Hi everyone, I’ve been chewing on this for a while and it’s time I raised it. I’m wondering if we really need ‘*ladies*’ on the jersey… when we could have ‘*women’ or leave it off completely. The awesome design speaks for itself without what I think is a limiting qualifier.
I’ve been doing archival research into 'the bike, the bloomer and the female cyclist in late 19th century Britain'**. Basically to cut it short, it tells a pretty awesome story of the fight women had to escape the domestic sphere, ride safely (ie. bloomers etc) and challenge draconian Victorian ideals of femininity. Remember this was a time when exercise (as well as education) was viewed as compromising a woman’s health and her potential to reproduce!
Despite winning many of the freedoms we appreciate today, a number of social restrictions of the time transferred to women on bikes - ie. the construction of 'the lady cyclist’ - with much pressure to appear ‘graceful’, ‘becoming’, ‘neat’, ‘sensible’, ‘charming’, ‘dignified’, ‘modest’, (while a discourse of heroism linked men and cycling with ‘speed’, ‘agility’, ‘performance’, ‘champion’, ‘professional’ ‘skill’ etc).
My argument is that vestiges of ‘the lady cyclist’ continue today to shape (and limit) who women can be on bikes. How often do we growl about the broad marketing categories of Men’s bikes/cycling (serious, expensive) and Ladies’ bikes/cycling (bit flowery, lower end) etc etc.
So, my point is, sure, some of us are ladies (sometimes) but we are so much more : )
*apologies if I have missed this debate already….
**just finished two years on this - www.cyclingcultures.org.uk -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Two rubbish tall bikes made of rubbish with rubbish welding.
Kind of road worthy (not really, but that’s kind of the point of a freakbike)
No nice parts to speak of.
Three-wheeler is single speed.
The other pretends to have gears.
Might be fun for someone.
Free to a brave home (or else they’ll return to rubbish).
Pick up from Kings Cross. -
-
-
-
-
https://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en...d=0CKUBEPwSMAA
Thanks!
I have to go to LMNH first to pick something up. Will swing by after that.....
-
-
Super cool. I'm in. See you all there.