Search results for:

Sure, but what I meant was that rather than deleting content/banning the person and risking infringing on their speech as protected by the act, just make them invisible to logged in users and they’ll scream into the void for a while and then bugger off (hopefully).

My thinking there was to put people on others block lists if they are being annoying, so they’re allowed to say legal things, but no logged in user can see them.

It’s vague, but - how does a ban on politics get along with:

22-(2)When deciding on, and implementing, safety measures and policies, a duty to have particular regard to the importance of protecting users’ right to freedom of expression within the law.

I may be wrong, but - I think “no politics” rules (and similar) are no longer allowed - the section I posted earlier, maybe 22?

Do I have to be a UK resident? As I am not.

(Yes, there are other reasons which I didn’t realise it was necessary to outline originally, but LFGSS).

Are honorary doctorates accepted as a recognised qualification by say New Zealand?

And this will then help me to get a visa for degree only countries?

So I sponsor someone who doesn’t give a fuck about the field, and that makes me feel better about myself? I admit I’m unclear on how this works.

I don’t have a degree- I went to UCL to study Architecture but being an alcoholic torpedoed that pretty effectively.

I admit I feel that failure, sometimes more than others- and would like to get a degree, if for no other reason than to prove that I can actually do it, although I very much enjoy learning.

What options have people here pursued for a degree qualification later in life when they have a pretty demanding job?

I’d offer to move the hosting to Singapore but I suspect that would be frying pan to fire.

There has been some discussion about how to prepare for this eventuality recently- no use to you and I apologise if this seems uncaring but it might be useful for others.

Apparently the typical MO for a thief that steals your phone whilst in use is to open the camera app, which prevents the screen lock from occurring. This means that they can get to a place where they’ll be undisturbed and then access your apps, including SMS, WhatsApp and email in order to get codes and authorisations. Apple iOS has a function where with a long press on an application you can select additional login requirements- Face ID to open the SMS app for example.

I have set this for all my messaging applications including social media such as Instagram which have a messaging function which might be used to attack people using my identity. What this means is that even if the thief grabs the phone whilst it is unlocked they can’t then open any app which they might use to access your banking/place orders, or attack your contacts.

The other thing to do is to set a SIM PIN so that the attacker cannot put your SIM into another phone in order to receive one time passwords.

They also look better, I agree. Does mean all three of my bikes will look largely identical.

Wipe it remotely if you can and get your network provide to suspend your SIM so it can’t be used to receive two factor codes.

Change the password on your email accounts for the same reason.

Noticed it in Carter Marsh when discussing my parents French slate clock which they’re regulating- seemed to be less money than I thought it would be.

I acknowledge that a coil doesn’t make a huge amount of sense for flat ground but I find I prefer how they feel/load up.

With the Ohlins coil this time, going to run it 150/150 so a little steeper than stock, and it’s a size down from before to see if the largely flat trails I have suit that more.

No, I’m in the UK currently

I’m completely at sea with regards to values now. How does this seem?

Soon.

Nowhere to put them, so yes- would shift them when the LM’s were ready

There may be a degree of FAFO for many I suspect.

I’ll need a new home for the Carrera five spokes- 18”, lightest Porsche wheels. N rated PS2’s but 6/7 years old now.

But- if this is a case of banning someone for saying something that the mods don’t like, then the suggestion from the passage I posted above is that that’s not permitted.

Depends. You have the right not to serve someone- but not for a reason that is illegal.

Don’t give that as the reason and you are generally fine- for example you suspected they were using fake ID rather than they’re black.