-
I'm not talking about an 'ordinary' Westerners consumption.
I know you go on to address this slightly but we should talk about it. Yes the ultra wealthy are highly destructive from a resource consumption point of view but the ordinary western consumption, especially in areas like the southern US states, middle east, affluent far east pockets is not sustainable if others aspire to it.
I don't have time to look for it but there are reasonable estimates that the global population could live a western 1970's-80's level of consumption sustainably. This would see a massive uplift in living standards for the global majority, a minor reduction for many and a unthinkable level of reduction for the wealthy.
We can't afford to perpetuate that the current 'typical' western lifestyle is without harm or just
There is a large body of work in the degrowth/ steady state economics looking at this but it challenges societies political and economic expectations of endless growth
-
This is the more active podcast thread
https://www.lfgss.com/conversations/185209/?offset=600#comment17547081 -
This is a good report on the issues we face and obviously being a whole year out of date, we have managed to make the situation worse
https://www.postcarbon.org/publications/welcome-to-the-great-unraveling/The great simplification with Nate Hagens is a great podcast trying to answer the topic of this thread
Relevant Kevin Anderson quote
-
-
-
I have normal non smart thermopro meters scattered around the house and they are good
For smart functionality and logging I have switchbot sensors which have been great but don't have a visual display
https://amzn.eu/d/94FvQju -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Came back a few weeks ago, from a week here:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/travel/article/2024/jul/25/mindfulness-retreat-devon-sharpham-estateCan not recommend it highly enough, has been an incredible experience for me
-
-
-
The CCS bashing feels slightly like looking for reasons to bash Starmer.
The are no credible IPCC IAM models for below 3C that don't involve vast amounts of CCS. There are very fair critisms of these models and thier reliance on CCS, the energy requirements and future societies willingness to pay for it but the UK has favourable geology and the potential to be a global leader, just as we were last month being the first G7 to go off coal.
Existing CCS is currently not great and as pointed out being used for enhanced recovery of fossil fuels which is self defeating but 22bn over decades is peanuts for potentially unlocking a new technology.
The CCC scenarios all have BECCS in them, again problematic but they haven't found a solution that gets the UK to net zero without it. If people have better solutions, I'm sure they'd welcome your evidence submission for helping them write the 7th carbon budget. -
-
-
-
-
Yes the current forecast is 8 in 10 people will be from Asia or Africa by 2100, with Africa trippling it's population between now and then. Asia will be declining by 2100 but continued growth from now until 2080.
We are ill prepared for the coming demographic shifts and thier seems little appetite for discussion or planning for it. Europe has seen tiny changes so far compared to what's coming and already sees it's politics not fit for purpose and populations resistant and unprepared.