-
The actual transcript is unbelievable
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/breaking-boris-johnson-refuses-four-17203410?
-
This is a fair observation. Johnson looks like he is dead inside. He might at last be beginning to realise that being PM is difficult if you are a bullshitter. Sadly, it seems like he will have to learn that the hard way (i.e. he will become PM), and that we will all suffer from his delusion. Exactly the same pattern that we had with Cameron.
https://twitter.com/OwenSmith_MP/status/1143405822090891264?s=19
-
Interesting piece on the Oxford connection
https://amp.ft.com/content/85fc694c-9222-11e9-b7ea-60e35ef678d2
(You need a subscription)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Yes, Cameron's desperate (but typically lazy) move to appease UKIP voters does seem to have backfired spectacularly, both in terms of retaining a sizeable group of extreme anti-EU members within the party, and also, of course, in deciding to go ahead with the referendum in the first place. The Tory party is pretty fucked.
-
Johnson is clearly laying low in this debate, studiously ignoring any challenges (i.e. just continuing to say his piece), and keeping out of any disagreements. He's being very quiet. Probably the right tactic. The absence of a live studio audience makes it a bit lacking in atmosphere (and I wouldn't be surprised if that was a condition of Johnson's participation). So far, Lynton Crosby must be rubbing his hands with glee behind the scenes.
-
-
-
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1141029016956231680?s=19
B. Johnson: 126 (+12)
J. Hunt: 46 (+3)
M. Gove: 41 (+4)
R. Stewart: 37 (+18)
S. Javid: 33 (+10)
D. Raab: 30 (+3)Good riddance to Raab. Javid still in (I think).
-
-
That is hilarious/terrifying.
Here's the original source which has other interesting details.
https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/06/18/most-conservative-members-would-see-party-destroye -
-
Really grown-up tactics...
https://twitter.com/FraserNelson/status/1140866694530949122?s=19
-
-
It was interesting hearing Matthew Paris on Any Questions say that he thought the Conservative party members would consider Johnson's record (rather than his personality) when making their decision. He distinguished the behaviour of the members from that of Conservative MPs (who are, in many cases, acting out of their own career interests). I'm not sure it's a credible argument but it provides some faint hope in these otherwise forlorn times.
And the moral is: think twice before contacting the police if you have concerns over what might be happening next door
https://twitter.com/PickardJE/status/1143852787039723520?s=19