-
-
-
-
-
recently (relatively speaking) i have been cooking our weekly chicken joined in a tray bake. this means i have the backbones, and sometimes the wing tips (uncooked), accumulating in bags in the freezer.
I have 3 large freezer bags full at this point and i want to use them up to make chicken stock and chicken soup.
so the question is, should i roast the bits of carcass before making the stock, or not? some say yes, some say no.
personally, i never found that stock made from the carcass of a roast chicken was quite as clean tasting as that made from fresh off cuts such as wings etc.
(what i used to do before the kids moved out and / or became vegan, i'd do a roast chicken whole each week and then use the carcass for stock).
so - lightly roast or just chuck in the stock pan raw?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@Buildhigh could you make a tote bag?
fairly simple design, happy to pay a deposit up front if it is something you could contemplate?
-
To expand a bit:
If I buy a shitcoin for £1 and it goes up to £1m, whilst I have a notional gain of £999,999, I have only risked £1 so I can only lose up to £1.
If shitcoin goes to zero, I have made a notional loss of £1m but I'm only £1 down on the trade.
Did the £999,999 ever exist? If I had got out at the top, and sold my shitcoin for £1m, then yeah it does exist and someone else is nursing a £1m loss. If I held from £1 all the way down to zero then it's arguable that the £999,999 never existed.
With a volatile "asset" like crypto, not everyone can get out at the top as the act of selling will quickly reduce the value.
-
where do you see all that money going?
i don't understand the question - it would go to the same place all market gains come from and losses go to.
as tertius says above, the huge majority of it is unrealised gains so it isn't "real" money in any case. it would mean that guy can stop looking for his hard drive, among other things.
-
the infrastructure manager (IM, ie Network Rail) and Train Operators (TOCs) are incentivised to reduce delays by penalty payments for delay minutes (and in some cases bonus payments for exceeding performance metrics), known as the "performance regime".
As rhb says, to make this work it is necessary to attribute delay to prime cause, so that the right organisation picks up the bill. in the days of commercial train service franchises (these all ended during the pandemic), train operators had a profit motive to be better at analysing and challenging delay causes, to reduce their exposure to delay penalty payments. this did lead to quite a lot of effort going into delay attribution.
the benefit of this is greater understanding of the causes of delays which makes it more likely that something can be done to address the root cause. the downside was it was not efficient at a whole industry level.
it will be interesting to see how the performance regime evolves under GBR, where the P&L is combined between IM and TOC so the commercial incentive to attribute delays goes away. -
-
-
-
i think they did some time ago but you can avoid by a regular investment plan?
i'm now annoyed as i have a vanguard account considerably below £32k.