Most recent activity
-
[FONT=Trebuchet MS]Cheers Oliver for top organisation (++for the sesame snaps!) [/FONT]
[FONT=Trebuchet MS] [/FONT]
[FONT=Trebuchet MS]Didn't quite get around to registering for t'forum on the train back, better late than never though... I'm Chris, the tall guy with blank top in the photo. [/FONT]
[FONT=Trebuchet MS] [/FONT]
[FONT=Trebuchet MS]Thanks to everyone else for a good ride - lots of fun (minus the depressing reminder of how rapidly civil liberties are evaporating, bleh).[/FONT]
[FONT=Trebuchet MS] [/FONT]
[FONT=Trebuchet MS]Naomi: BAA don't seem to publish their byelaws online. From what I can gather [http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/archive/t-758006.html] the relevants bits are:[/FONT]
[FONT=Trebuchet MS] [/FONT]
[FONT=Trebuchet MS]3 (10) Allow anything on airport where forbidden
No person shall allow any vehicle, animal or thing to be on the airport after its presence on the airport has been forbidden by a Constable or an Airport Official and no Constable or Airport Official shall forbid the presence of any vehicle, animal or thing unless he has reasonable grounds to believe that its presence has been responsible for or is about to be responsible for a breach of a byelaw or for a criminal offence.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Trebuchet MS] [/FONT]
[FONT=Trebuchet MS]and[/FONT]
[FONT=Trebuchet MS] [/FONT]
[FONT=Trebuchet MS]
10 (1) State name and address
A person shall, if requested to do so by a Constable or Airport Official, state his correct name and address and the purpose of his being on the airport.
[/FONT]
[FONT=Trebuchet MS] [/FONT]
[FONT=Trebuchet MS]As far as I can remember, no explicit justification was given for the police/BAA forbidding our presence there. Given how forthright we were explaining or reasons for being there, I really don't think it's reasonable to assume we are about to breach any laws or conduct a criminal offence. Hence my personal complaint to the IPCC will be going in tomorrow morning. (Yup, with very likely zero effect other than to contribute a statistical something towards future graphs of the public’s satisfaction with the police).[/FONT]
Christ, first post fail. Sorry - forum now won't let me edit the thing until I've been on here for 24 hours either!
Should have looked more like:
Cheers Oliver for top organisation (++for the sesame snaps!)
Didn't quite get around to registering for t'forum on the train back, better late than never though... I'm Chris, the tall guy with blank top in the photo.
Thanks to everyone else for a good ride - lots of fun (minus the depressing reminder of how rapidly civil liberties are evaporating, bleh).
Naomi: BAA don't seem to publish their byelaws online. From what I can gather [http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/archive/t-758006.html] the relevants bits are:
and
As far as I can remember, no explicit justification was given for the police/BAA forbidding our presence there. Given how forthright we were explaining or reasons for being there, I really don't think it's reasonable to assume we are about to breach any laws or conduct a criminal offence. Hence my personal complaint to the IPCC will be going in tomorrow morning. (Yup, with very likely zero effect other than to contribute a statistical something towards future graphs of the public’s satisfaction with the police).