IDoNothing
Member since Mar 2009 • Last active May 2020Most recent activity
-
-
-
Freecycling some stuff if anyone is interested.
Fort ro.aero frame 58cm - GONE.
Kinesis DC07 carbon fork.
https://ibb.co/nD7c7d
https://ibb.co/kEfx7d27.2 carbon seatpost.
https://ibb.co/gEr4nd
https://ibb.co/nAivtJShimano 700c ‘wheelset’. 105 front hub with open pro rim, rs500 rear wheel. 25c Maxxis refuse tyres.
Collection M21.
-
-
Yeah, I agree.
I've never being trying to claim foakley = oakley lens, if anything I originally stated foakley != oakley. I think you'd have to be pretty foolish to believe 5 lenses for £12 are the same quality as 1 or 2 for £120. They are not whole different league or unusable though. Whatever your justification for buying them, you get functional cheap sunglasses.
-
-
-
Gotta call bullshit on the 'whole different league', at least in the case of oakley vs foakley (IMO, anecdotal, n=2, etc...). There are differences in the lenses (thickness and scratch resistance being the most notable, minor optical differences if you're really looking), but they are no worse than any other £10-15 pair of sunglasses and definitely not ~10 times worse, the price of oakleys implies.
-
It was this store: http://www.aliexpress.com/store/1927165
But I don't see them listed any more, they were up as something like "2016 New RD EV Pitch Polarized Cycling Glasses 5 Lens".This video (it's in Russian, but about the 15 min mark) suggests official lenses fit in fake jawbreaker frames too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHFeCtyzsww
Edit: or in English on the video on here http://www.bikebiz.com/news/read/they-re-just-bits-of-plastic-why-cyclists-buy-fake-oakleys/019427
Probably won't be back in time for unicorn. But will swing by the beginners polo for at least a beer. Might even see if my old polo bike functions...