-
• #2
No! Paltry 46...GLWS
-
• #3
Paltry 46
Perfect winter shoes! Think of how many pairs of socks you could wear in them ;-)
-
• #4
Anybody's feet grown yet?
£28 posted
-
• #5
Think I've spotted the left one AWOL
-
• #6
Now £26
-
• #7
Perhaps somebody would like to live in one of them?
-
• #8
This is 5 times my other half's shoe size.. wow. GLWS
-
• #10
Ha!😂
-
• #11
Now £25
-
• #12
@SwissChap - weren't you looking for some big shoes?
-
• #13
I am, but I'm afraid size 52 is a tad too big - that's HUGE! I'm after (probably) 49 wide ('wide' being important too). Thanks though!
-
• #15
Ooh that's useful to know, thanks a lot! I'm currently using a pair of size 50 Shimanos I got cheap - they're ok width-wise, but definitely too long. So 'wider but shorter' sounds just right, except I'd still expect to actually need size 49 personally. (With normal shoes it's more 48 usually, but it seems all sports shoes are cut small)
-
• #16
The measurements on their sizing chart ( for size 50 wide anyway ) are pleasingly accurate, in both the sports and competition last.
-
• #17
Also useful to know! I'll do some research on shoes soon, see if I can get the right size somewhere for a non-crazy amount of money.
-
• #18
Now £24, and I'll throw in some REALLY thick socks...
-
• #19
Now £22 posted
-
• #20
Mega dredge - £20 posted
-
• #21
hello! are these shoes still available?
-
• #22
Yep, still got them :-)
-
• #23
I would also be interested obviously if @user126258 decides to pass
-
• #24
I'll add you to the probably not very long list of people who want these shoes :-)
-
• #25
@BareNecessities I can fill the shoes, and I'm interested! are you willing to ship to the US? thank you much--
Shimano SH-MO88LE, size 52 wide MTB shoes.
Brand new in box. Bought as spares, but have since decided that Lake shoes fit me better.
Sold