-
• #2
I think it's been done elsewhere.
But in the absence of clarity: lolz. -
• #3
There are a few 'on here' members
-
• #4
His website is equally entertaining.
-
• #5
Too easy
-
• #6
In the hipster thread, for some reason.
-
• #7
anti
-
• #8
Slack for track.
-
• #9
The first thing you see:
A pre-vetted private members community
... is marred by A) first class cuntery and B) a fucking typo.
This is the epitome of what a certain guy called Marx was on about.
-
• #10
Freewheel for...?
-
• #11
I'm not sure how the tertiary economy fits within the means of production.
-
• #12
This is the epitome of what a certain guy called Marx was on about.
They should call themselves the EC1% Collective.
-
• #13
I tweeted him a slightly sarcastic tweet.
-
• #14
"We're not a cycling club in the traditional sense but rather a community of like-minded bike enthusiasts whose propensity to enjoy the finer things is maximised through an aggregated representation."
No way! I love maximising my propensity for the finer things through an aggregated representation!
-
• #15
I love marximising my propensity for the finer things through an aggregated representation!
Fixed.
-
• #16
Damn, I was hoping to aggregate my propensity for the finer things through maximised representation.
-
• #17
Hahaaaaa you all bit the bait, fell into my trap...
The Marx quote (Groucho Marx that is) I was thinking of is the comedy equivalent of the little girl running away do not want jpeg:
I don't care to belong to any club that will have me as a member.
In this case I wouldn't want to belong to any club that can't use the possessive apostrophe correctly on their 'mission statement'. Or even because they even have a 'mission statement'. Or numerous other reasons. Pre-vetted private members' club of bellwhiffs more like.
-
• #18
No way! ...
I lols
-
• #19
Pre-vetting seems a little tautological to me. Surely the whole point of vetting is that it is done pre-whatever?
-
• #20
You'll never be a member, you're not striving hard enough.
-
• #21
Pre-vetting seems a little tautological to me.
Absolute gibberish!
-
• #22
has @ùbér_grùbér seen this?
-
• #23
He was a founding member.
Allegedly.
-
• #24
His website is equally entertaining.
twotwofivemedia.com/
I particularly like the way he carefully states his address sans postcode:
TWOTWOFIVE MEDIA, 102 STANSTEAD ROAD, LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM
The fact it's SE23, Forest Hill, and the building is just off the South Circular, pretty much opposite a Maplin, a Travis Perkins, and a garden centre, might detract a little from his carefully cultivated image.
-
• #25
I knew you would enjoy this.
It's a stew of vanity and delusions.
Perhaps we should send him a link to the "Politics and the English Language" essay by George Orwell.
Have we done this yet?
http://ec1collective.com/
I look forward to your comments.