• Probably a daft question but I'll ask anyway and is a follow on question from my freewheel knee pain q.

    I've done a few rides on the freewheel side and the pain in my knee is just too worrying plus I got sciatica again.

    So I've accepted that fixed is just a better way of riding for me and will get easier the fitter I get (and lighter as I'm 3 stones overweight).

    I've an All City Nature boy frameset and omniums and some good quality wheels (though due to commuting I have M+'s on), but it's no light weight. It is very stiff though which has allowed me to go from 67" to 74"
    Would I notice the difference say between my current set up to something like a Cinelli Mash with some lightweight wheels whilst climbing and be faster. Or is it just emporer's clothing this lighter stiffer thing?

  • Lighter wheels would be more noticeable than a lighter frame, but (as I'm sure you already know) the extra three stones you are carrying dwarf any weight-savings you could make with the bike.

    Personally I find the difference between 72" and 74" particularly noticeable on hills: try gearing down a little.

    I'd also get your knee checked out.

  • If your knees are fucked, there's all sorts of possible causes - but increasing your gear ratio surely cannot help.

  • No they're not fucked, just a niggle when on freewheel. No pain at all on fixed, zilch, nada, nothing.

  • Surely the last thing you want if you have knee pain, is a bike with a single gear. Just gear down on a normal bike.

  • I increased my ratio as I live in a hilly area and the descents are better on a bigger ratio.

    I've been going out with a mate who has gears and loves the hillier hills. I tried freewheel as I felt guilty holding him up on some the delightful descents we have that are literally miles and miles long.

  • Cheers, like I said, no pain on fixed at all - during or after. I went to only having fixed as I noticed I never got sciatica symptoms like I do occasionally on geared / freewheel.

  • The wheels I bought off here are phil hubs on mavic rims so pretty light. I think I'll change the tyres over from the very heavy (but bullet proof) M+ to see if it makes a difference, thanks.

  • You're 3 stone overweight and you hold him up on downhills? How over weight is he? Lol. Can't you get a flip flop wheel? A gear on each side of the hub, so you can keep up on the downhills?
    Just an idea

  • Marathon Plus will kill any ride and trimming rotating mass has the best cost/benefit ratio.

    I understand your reasoning behind gearing-up, but surely what you gain downhill you lose uphill?

    If your mate has gears and you're fixed, you're never going to be equally matched.

    I still think you should get your knee looked at: there is some underlying cause of the pain, which riding fixed doesn't exacerbate, but neither is it going to cure.

  • Ha! I didn't say I don't hold him up, just not as much and I know that'll lessen as time goes on as my fitness comes back.

  • Ironically, gearing up has made hills easier for me. I don't know if this is because my previous fixed frames have been bendy (Pearson and pompino) or a combination with the omniums.

    I have just bought a 19t of a forum-er. So when it arrives sometime next week I'll give it a bash to see if a 2 tooth makes a difference.

    In regards to my mate...he'll have to wait or do round robins.

    I was just thinking of n+1 for a longer new commute over Bradford / Keighley way. I like the All City frame but from what I gather on here - lighter nimbler bikes seem fun.

  • How things change, I was only recently seriously considering a rohloff.

  • Speedplay pedals and cleats with plenty of float transformed how my knees felt whilst riding!

  • ...lighter nimbler bikes seem fun.

    Three stones is about 18.5kg, close to the equivalent of two bikes: how much lighter is a new bike going to be?

    Sorry to be a bore, but a new bike isn't the answer.

  • Ah, but if I have a lighter bike, it'll always be lighter no matter what weight I am.

    Therefore a nicer bike at +3 stone should be just as nice an improvement at -3 stone, no?

    Or can fatty's not appreciate a nicer ride?

  • Hell, if you can afford a new bike, go for it. It'll only encourage you to ride more and probably shed a few pounds.
    I'd seriously consider a geared road bike though, and some physio to see what's up with your knee. Most frequently it's one of a combination of:

    • tight ITB (use a foam roller to help fix)
    • bad cleat positioning
    • bad saddle positioning
      But fuck knows, could be all manner of things. But do try to get the problem sorted, it'll only get worse.
  • No because the bike is making less proportional difference as your weight increases. Take it to extremes to make it clearer, ifyou weighed a ton the difference in bike weight compared to total mass would be negligible, if you weighed 1 kg the bike weight would be hugely significant.

  • You'll notice it, at least I do. How that can make knee pain any better? If you're forking the money for a new bike get something geared until you get your knees sorted

  • I'd concentrate on losing the 3 stone first. That will make a lot more difference than a lighter bike.

  • Sure, but with typical bike (and human) weights the proportion of bike to bike+rider weight only changes very slightly as the rider weight changes.

    10kg bike, 76kg rider: Bike is 11.6% of bike+rider weight
    10kg bike, 92kg rider: Bike is 9.8% of bike+rider weight

    ~91% (+/- 1%) of the bike+rider weight is still me, even if I lose ~16kg.

  • New bike is always the answer.

    Descending fixed is brutal on the legs. I'd look to a flip flop rear wheel. For climbing. Stiffness will be more noticeable than a few kgs.

  • Descending fixed is brutal on the legs.

    You say that like it's a bad thing.

  • Descending a cat 1 climb on 41:26. Turns my legs to useless sacks of piss. Which is unfortunate. As I descend it before climbing it.

    I guess if the hill is shallow and short enough to spin down.

    I tend to do rides with long climbs/descents which only require swapping between 48:16 and 41:26 once or twice.

    Doing a rolling terrain ride with someone on gears sounds problematic to me.

  • Out of interest, how come you do this to yourself? Isn't it more... sensible? Practical? To ride a geared bike, rather than flipping a wheel and getting your hands dirty?
    Or do you just like channelling pre-war cyclists? Fucking kudos to you for riding a cat1 climb on a fixed though. Hard work.

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Will I notice a stiffer lighter frame whilst climbing?

Posted by Avatar for bluebikerider @bluebikerider

Actions