For Sale: 56.5 cm Roberts 653 Lo-Pro Frame

Posted on
  • Lovely Lo-Pro fame from Chas Roberts.

    653 Tubing, Classic Fillet Brazing. Aero forks and Cinelli 'Sharks Fin' Bottom Bracket.

    This is the shit you need for summer fun.

    £220 - in London.

    Cash welcome. No tire-kickers, no time-wasters (please).


    3 Attachments

    • Roberts 2.jpg
    • Roberts 1.jpg
    • Roberts 4.jpg
  • Nice price

  • A beaut.

  • What year is it?

  • Sorry,

    Don't know the year.

  • Dibs if the front ain't 24" and the top tube not longer than 56cm.

    Can you measure it c-c and tell me how long both the virtual and actual top tube are?

  • Will do in the morning.

    Cheers.

  • Thanks!

  • Look on the bottom bracket - the first two numbers will be the year it was made.

  • Actual TT Length = 58cm
    Effective TT Length = 52cm

  • More pics?!

  • very very nice....have a bump!

  • I do have some more pics, but was struggling to load them.

    I will try again later, as I have to go off now and do some parenting!

  • Parenting and lo pro´s. Era of the modern man...

  • JJ, it appears to be slightly to big for me - I don't want to stretch too much.
    The lo-pro I have at the moment is 58cm.

    The other thing is, is it me or the top tub has a dent?

  • Look on the bottom bracket - the first two numbers will be the year it was made.

    Any news on the year of manufacture?

  • ^^EEI, I think that's the entry for the through-toptube-brakecable.. You can also see the exit at the underside of the tt near the seattube..

  • Rodolfo is correct, there is no dent - internal-routed brake cable.

    @ Bodieanddoyle - forgot to take my glasses this morning when I measured the frame, couldn't read the numbers. will pop out again later and post the result.

  • ^^EEI, I think that's the entry for the through-toptube-brakecable.. You can also see the exit at the underside of the tt near the seattube..

    That's what I thought, just wanted to make sure.
    It's a lovely frame, but I seem to have a bad luck - my Argos was 53cm, Simoncini is 58cm. I need something 54-55cm (bit smaller than a road bike's size) with a top tube of 55-56cm max.
    The only thing with lo-pros, it's very hard to tell the size before it's built up.

  • So you'll be selling the Simoncini?

  • @ B&D, 'tis an '89 - a fine year for lo-Pro's

  • So you'll be selling the Simoncini?

    If I find something of similar quality and for the same crazy price, yes.

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

For Sale: 56.5 cm Roberts 653 Lo-Pro Frame

Posted by Avatar for Jingle_Jangle @Jingle_Jangle

Actions