Max was designed 'rule of thumb' to resist sideways forces at the bottom bracket with it's orientated ellipse profile. The ellipse is 40.3 x 30 and the tube has a 0.5 wall at max butt position. Considering locally the bottom bracket end where the ellipse is orientated on the x axis then the second moment of area using the above numbers is roughly 0.99cm4 so more rigid then a round 953 tube at this point to a force in the x axis .. however the tube shape transitions along the length and the second moment of area changes along the length and also in practice I don't believe the forces experienced would be aligned with the x axis only .. so honestly I can not calculate which is overall more rigid, I'd suggest Max.
Max was designed 'rule of thumb' to resist sideways forces at the bottom bracket with it's orientated ellipse profile. The ellipse is 40.3 x 30 and the tube has a 0.5 wall at max butt position. Considering locally the bottom bracket end where the ellipse is orientated on the x axis then the second moment of area using the above numbers is roughly 0.99cm4 so more rigid then a round 953 tube at this point to a force in the x axis .. however the tube shape transitions along the length and the second moment of area changes along the length and also in practice I don't believe the forces experienced would be aligned with the x axis only .. so honestly I can not calculate which is overall more rigid, I'd suggest Max.