You are reading a single comment by @skydancer and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Read about that on the BBC site.

    http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-25926572

    Absolutely outrageous and clearly based on prejudice against cyclists rather than anything legitimate.
    Is there any way for the public to complain against such a decision?

    This is from the Association of Bikeability Schemes in response to the ASA's ruling on riding position

    A core principle of the National Standard guidance is about riding in a position where a
    cyclist is most likely to be seen by drivers. This advice from the ASA contradicts the
    Department for Transports own guidelines which state:
    (Riders must) understand where to ride on roads being used: Trainees must understand the
    primary and secondary positions. Trainees must position themselves where they can be seen and
    should not cycle in the gutter. Where there is little other traffic and/or there is plenty of room to be
    overtaken they may ride in the secondary position. Where the road is narrow and two-way traffic
    would make it hazardous for the trainee to be overtaken by a following vehicle they must be observed
    to ride in the primary position. If the trainee is riding at the speed of other traffic then they should do
    so in the primary position.

About

Avatar for skydancer @skydancer started