"What if", "could have been done". It's the same extrapolation from otherwise anonymous internet comments as to say "what if" the angry HGV driver really did go and hit a cyclist who "could" die.
I'm just pointing out that these two cases are very much similar and if revealing details (or threatening to reveal them) is OK in one, then it's OK in the other, and vice versa.
The police probably wouldn't take kindly if the HGV man was contacted with a veiled threat to his job and livelihood - tbh Lynchman was punished more (or more punishment was made ready) because he did a cardinal sin against the forum and its users.
Anyway, what happened to Bossman's edict that "everyone has a right to an opinion of whatever form"? Clearly that doesn't include disliking cyclists. Or, on here, racism, sexism, and fictional deathism.
"What if", "could have been done". It's the same extrapolation from otherwise anonymous internet comments as to say "what if" the angry HGV driver really did go and hit a cyclist who "could" die.
I'm just pointing out that these two cases are very much similar and if revealing details (or threatening to reveal them) is OK in one, then it's OK in the other, and vice versa.
The police probably wouldn't take kindly if the HGV man was contacted with a veiled threat to his job and livelihood - tbh Lynchman was punished more (or more punishment was made ready) because he did a cardinal sin against the forum and its users.
Anyway, what happened to Bossman's edict that "everyone has a right to an opinion of whatever form"? Clearly that doesn't include disliking cyclists. Or, on here, racism, sexism, and fictional deathism.