It is not a thought crime - it is closer to incitement to hatred which is a crime in this country.
Then go to the police.
If you think he's committed a crime, go to the police.
If you wanted to contact the firm to let them know of their potential risk of corporate manslaughter, then fair enough but I still don't see how publishing his details on the internet achieves this. Surely you'd email the firm and let them know their liability and risks with enough information that they can act on (links to the relevant acts and examples of prior cases).
And yet, those who have emailed and posted it in here haven't mentioned corporate manslaughter. So that doesn't appear to be the intent, nope... it's more simple than that, it's just mob rule and this guy who pissed everyone off must pay for whatever his words were.
Do you think the guy is going to hate cyclists more or less by contributing to losing his job? Do you think that will make him more or less of a risk?
Whatever he's done, I've seen nothing in what people have posted to suggest that the way to change his behaviour or protect others is to publish his details online.
What it does do is create a lot of liability for individuals who participate in the online mob.
And you compare doxing someone for thoughts expressed in a private Facebook group, to citations and accounts of bad driving in the real world... these are not the same thing.
Then go to the police.
If you think he's committed a crime, go to the police.
If you wanted to contact the firm to let them know of their potential risk of corporate manslaughter, then fair enough but I still don't see how publishing his details on the internet achieves this. Surely you'd email the firm and let them know their liability and risks with enough information that they can act on (links to the relevant acts and examples of prior cases).
And yet, those who have emailed and posted it in here haven't mentioned corporate manslaughter. So that doesn't appear to be the intent, nope... it's more simple than that, it's just mob rule and this guy who pissed everyone off must pay for whatever his words were.
Do you think the guy is going to hate cyclists more or less by contributing to losing his job? Do you think that will make him more or less of a risk?
Whatever he's done, I've seen nothing in what people have posted to suggest that the way to change his behaviour or protect others is to publish his details online.
What it does do is create a lot of liability for individuals who participate in the online mob.
And you compare doxing someone for thoughts expressed in a private Facebook group, to citations and accounts of bad driving in the real world... these are not the same thing.