93, covering a whole year, is hardly a lot for anyone interested in photography.
If it had been 93 outstanding images I'd agree still think it was too many, for a web gallery. Maybe if they were presenting an actual physical exhibition…
But anyway, there were quite a few bland images of uninteresting stories in there.
I was taught that your set is only ever as good as it's weakest image. Lot's of examples of astounding subject matter exceedingly well shot being dragged down by the dross.
If it had been 93 outstanding images I'd
agreestill think it was too many, for a web gallery. Maybe if they were presenting an actual physical exhibition…But anyway, there were quite a few bland images of uninteresting stories in there.
I was taught that your set is only ever as good as it's weakest image. Lot's of examples of astounding subject matter exceedingly well shot being dragged down by the dross.