-
• #77
That's incredible. Bang on my size too if you ever wish to sell it, though I hope you don't have to.
-
• #78
First test ride tonight, I didn't fall off, it didn't break.
It's now painted, and has a brake and a saddle and peddles and stuff. Pictures soon, but my camera battery is out and my phone camera is really, really out of focus lately.
It works! It fits! I can get in the drops without it hurting!
-
• #79
Nooooooo, the tease! Pics or it didn't happen
-
• #80
-
• #81
-
• #82
-
• #83
-
• #84
I'm just worried that I'm going to hit a hole, bump down hard on the saddle, bend the seat stays and the end section of top tube.
I was going to shape the extra sleeve tube that connects to the seat post to give more support along the extra top tube. Not sure how/why I forgot about that until now.
Oh well, if the worse happens, I'll just have to start over.
-
• #85
That is really nice. Hopefully the problems you described above won't occur (touchwood). Looks brilliant.
-
• #86
Really cool frame to build yourself and very suitable paint and finish!
You ca be proud of the bike
-
• #87
Stunning work as ever.
-
• #88
Love this. Who did the paint for you?
-
• #89
I feel that we often underestimate the strength of steel, I don't think you need to worry about it breaking easily, unless there's a worrying amount of flex on the rear when sat on the bicycle.
-
• #90
Thanks, chaps.
Paint was by me. Just rattle-canned to get me through to spring when the weather is a little better for proper painting, and to make sure the colours I think I want work. Gold lug lining mostly worked, but I'm still in two minds about the head tube lugs where the lining is a bit thick.
Ed, I think you're right, it feels pretty stiff, but you never know the forces involved in a really big pothole, but any bike can break. Feels good so far anyway :).
-
• #91
This is brilliant - really interesting build. Definitely makes learning frame building appealing, especially if you can build anything you imagine.
Excuse my dodgy photoshop, but did you ever consider a design like this ( i know it takes the gate part away)
-
• #92
Tempting! I've not seen standard seat stays and a triple-triangle together - probably due to extra weight + redundant strength, but I quite like it. maybe needs bendy top-tube and lo-pro-ness too.
-
• #93
Now that would be ace!
-
• #94
Surly there wouldn't be any use for the extra chain stays rendering it a hetchins. I think this is brilliant, awesome as it is. Although it needs some proper brake levers! Hetchins bendy lo-pro, now that would be incredible.
-
• #95
Very nice work! I've read about this frame design a bit, but I'm not totally clear on the "why". Is it just to achieve a slightly shorter wheelbase by tucking the back wheel in?
-
• #96
I think it's perfect as it is, much more unique than the curvy seat tube.
-
• #97
It goes against every principle I have ever held dear and every fibre of my body to agree with Ed, but I do. It is perfect just as it is! There doesn't need to be a 'why?'.
-
• #98
Very nice work! I've read about this frame design a bit, but I'm not totally clear on the "why". Is it just to achieve a slightly shorter wheelbase by tucking the back wheel in?
I'm sure there were technical reasons, but I think at least part of it was it's recognisable shape - at the time the amateur TT'ers couldn't have any advertising on their frames but a flying gate was so distictinctive it got around this.
This is a glorious build.
-
• #99
^this same principle with the hetchins. Not sure on any other wacky frame designs that emerged because of that rule.
Good improvisation. Thanks for the linkage.