Just because BoJo and the rest use RLJs as a convenient, yet specious, focus for how to improve cycle safety, doesn't mean that focusing on RLJs will do a damn thing.
Once all cyclists conform to all road laws, and wear hi-viz, and have insurance, and pay road tax, then what? Will cycling suddenly become safer / better / more normalised? Will infrastructure improve? Will drivers be held more accountable to slip-ups and SMIDSYs?
It's a mistake to rail against red light jumpers.
Rail againt Boris et al. for focusing on the wrong thing.
Some cyclists jump red lights. We know this.
Just because BoJo and the rest use RLJs as a convenient, yet specious, focus for how to improve cycle safety, doesn't mean that focusing on RLJs will do a damn thing.
Once all cyclists conform to all road laws, and wear hi-viz, and have insurance, and pay road tax, then what? Will cycling suddenly become safer / better / more normalised? Will infrastructure improve? Will drivers be held more accountable to slip-ups and SMIDSYs?
It's a mistake to rail against red light jumpers.
Rail againt Boris et al. for focusing on the wrong thing.