My point in to operate a policy of harm reduction policy. Enforce the things that are more risky to others. Having 4 policemen handing out leaflets and talking to cyclists about pavement cycling will not reduce harm, having the same policemen pulling over drivers on their phones will reduce the possibility of harm.
People talk about speeding (a factor in many incidents) almost proudly while the every single time the media talk about cycling they ask about rljing which while illegal, doesn't feature in many harmful incidents.
My point in to operate a policy of harm reduction policy. Enforce the things that are more risky to others. Having 4 policemen handing out leaflets and talking to cyclists about pavement cycling will not reduce harm, having the same policemen pulling over drivers on their phones will reduce the possibility of harm.
People talk about speeding (a factor in many incidents) almost proudly while the every single time the media talk about cycling they ask about rljing which while illegal, doesn't feature in many harmful incidents.