You are reading a single comment by @miro_o and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • You can adjust behaviour with rules.

    I like your crime & punishment analogy and totally agree harsh sentences work only so far.

    Luckily pro cycling is different. It's very specific and that makes it easier to write effective rules!

    The overwhelming majority of athletes come into the sport with a love of it and with good intentions. Riders will dope if the testing is insufficient and the fall-out from a positive has limited effect. It's as simple as that. So what here can change?

    Testing for known drugs is about to turn a corner with the ability to detect past doping in dna. The idea that retrospective testing for currently undetectable PEDs should make most riders realise they're is always a chance you'll be found-out, at any point. So maybe we are close to a system where real punishment* can be handed out if/when doping control's science finally catches up with dopers (and their doctors).

    *by real I mean career bans from the sport they love and which they rely on for income.

About

Avatar for miro_o @miro_o started