Doping

Sooo... by admission a career long deceitful liar and a cheat, with nothing to gain from carrying on lying other than saving his business and of course selling more copies of his book, is Rasmussen now considered a creditable witness?

Personal I'll believe just about anything by now, but nevertheless I consider it a vital problem that virtually every rider who's ever come clean, including Armstrong, Hamilton, Riis, Rasmussen and so on, could be accused of doing so for personal gain and/or damage limitation.

In this specific case for instance, what exactly makes Rasmussen so much more creditable than than Riis and others, past and present riders, getting the knife in Rasmussen's new book? Anyway you look at it, the list of people stepping forward purely for the sake of the sport are few and far between.