I'm confused, as are many fellow tossers out there... Arguably that's our problem, but if there is no real consensus within the organisation combined with the fact that LCC simply can't communicate their views in plain language in order for the average village idiot to understand them, what hope in hell have we got of putting cycling campaign at the forefront of the political agenda, be that in London or the country as a whole, let alone the Houses of Parliament?
I withstand that Scoble is kinda right - may the Lord have mercy on my soul - it does seem... kinda, seem and kinda being the keywords, that LCC is set on segregation, thus the catchy "mix where possible, segregate where necessary" motto. The question is, where exactly is it possible to mix, and where is it necessary to segregate? And please don't expect me, or anyone else for that matter, to attend an LCC meeting in order to understand.
"Ceterum censeo Ed Scoble esse delendam."
PS@MM
Please not that the term "apartheid'" was crossed out.
@MM & BB
I'm confused, as are many fellow tossers out there... Arguably that's our problem, but if there is no real consensus within the organisation combined with the fact that LCC simply can't communicate their views in plain language in order for the average village idiot to understand them, what hope in hell have we got of putting cycling campaign at the forefront of the political agenda, be that in London or the country as a whole, let alone the Houses of Parliament?
I withstand that Scoble is kinda right - may the Lord have mercy on my soul - it does seem... kinda, seem and kinda being the keywords, that LCC is set on segregation, thus the catchy "mix where possible, segregate where necessary" motto. The question is, where exactly is it possible to mix, and where is it necessary to segregate? And please don't expect me, or anyone else for that matter, to attend an LCC meeting in order to understand.
"Ceterum censeo Ed Scoble esse delendam."
PS@MM
Please not that the term "apartheid'" was crossed out.