You are reading a single comment by @Velocio and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
@Velocio
This is a question about identity on forums, there are implications in the answer that you choose and these are roughly balanced thus:
Real identity helps fight spam and trolls, holds people to account for their posts, enables sharing of your actions across social networks and would enable business communities more easily.
Pseudonyms as identity helps encourage deeper debate (less fear of persecution for your views), helps to isolate community activity from social networks.
Forums traditionally have supported the pseudonym approach, whereas social networks pioneered the real identity approach.
The question I seek to answer is which is better, and why, and would the use of real identity increase or decrease your participation in a community. Not just LFGSS, but other communities.
I am not going to pretend that I could offer full anonymity at all. Using a pseudonym you could achieve anonymity, but only if you used a VPN, used Tor, and then never actually said anything. I will promise as much as is realistic, and that is merely that you could obscure your identity.