Potential scenario: Beavers vs CMD at 4-4 on golden goal, Kremin shoots from right-wing, big shot, ball hits the back of the net before his follow through makes contact with Greg through the cut-out in his cage. Disallow goal? Just curious.
Yep, I would call that, which some see as the problem with my version of the high-sticking rule. I would also possibly support the argument that a high-sticking call wouldn't disallow a goal though (you would just be awarded the ball if the game wasn't done).
The alternative is to allow all high-sticking on shots and accept that sometimes a team will win a game just as they (potentially) hospitalise an opponent, or that occasionally a player may deliberately strike another under the the disguise of a normal shot.
Yep, I would call that, which some see as the problem with my version of the high-sticking rule. I would also possibly support the argument that a high-sticking call wouldn't disallow a goal though (you would just be awarded the ball if the game wasn't done).
The alternative is to allow all high-sticking on shots and accept that sometimes a team will win a game just as they (potentially) hospitalise an opponent, or that occasionally a player may deliberately strike another under the the disguise of a normal shot.
Neither situation is ideal.