-
• #52153
Doucheoween
-
• #52154
Want
-
• #52155
photobomb, level expert
-
• #52156
-
• #52157
-
• #52158
-
• #52159
^ Ha, and ^^ Ha!
-
• #52160
-
• #52161
the fuck.
Oh. Whoah.
-
• #52162
slowmo
-
• #52163
Conjoined?
Would.
Actually, would.
-
• #52164
so many legs....
-
• #52165
they are both about 14.
-
• #52167
they are both
obviously?
-
• #52168
borderline enough to make saying "yeah, would" pretty :-/
IMO.
-
• #52169
-
• #52170
Still, shit music; shit lifestyle -
• #52171
USA! USA!
-
• #52172
hmm having been a smoker, and had it suppress my hunger, I'm always amazed at fat smokers. takes dedication
-
• #52173
Left, right
-
• #52174
dan
borderline enough to make saying "yeah, would" pretty :-/IMO.
Hmmmm....
Not sure about this, Dan, my old fruit. The theme of my statement was based around that odd contemplative moment that men have, when they make a comment, actually think about it, and actually agree with the aforementioned comment. For example, if someone had posted two haggered old drag queens instead, albeit in the same situation, I'd have made the same comment. As a former secondary school deputy head and designated CPO, I reckon the humour of reflective contemplation around shagging attractive conjoined twins, after vacuously stating I would do so without any though initially, would be the part folk would concentrate on, rather than the speculative age of the girls in question.
But seriously, would.
(Just kiddin' around!)
-
• #52175
I'm calling bullshit...
That is fucking horrible apollo