The strange thing is, the "arsehole" tweet was re-tweeted from the official LCC account, and the re-tweet was public for most of the day, including for some time after the election result was announced.
As it happens, Oliver got my second-preference vote, and this in an election which saw around 7% of LCC members exercising their right to vote. A typical turnout, from what I understand.
I may have voted for Oliver, but I was not at all happy with his procedural mischief during the AGM, which led to the Twitter outburst. Neither were the Lewisham and Greenwich people with whom I was sitting in the hall.
I was in the hall, and voted for Oliver's amendment, as did 20 odd other people, so we were all happy with his procedural mischief. Rachel Aldred had no objections either, and she proposed the motion which Oliver was trying to amend.
I disagreed with your motion, and tried to amend it. Does that make me an 'arsehole' too?
I was in the hall, and voted for Oliver's amendment, as did 20 odd other people, so we were all happy with his procedural mischief. Rachel Aldred had no objections either, and she proposed the motion which Oliver was trying to amend.
I disagreed with your motion, and tried to amend it. Does that make me an 'arsehole' too?