Where is the line drawn for free speech when it comes to these things? Books that promote incest is beyond it I'd say, but holocaust denial? Is that an opinion / belief?
starts shit-storm debate
Playing devils advocate (maybe literally) the idea that Incest is an abomination of sorts surely only old cultural hang ups or religious dogma?
I am not saying that it is healthy or right, but I do not think it is society/goverment's place to criminalise such behaviour and even censor information about it.
That to me, seems exactly the same as criminalising homosexuality.
In terms of literature about holocaust denial, it would be extremely ironic if these were criminalised considering the whole deal with fascism and book burning. There must always be freedom of information.
Playing devils advocate (maybe literally) the idea that Incest is an abomination of sorts surely only old cultural hang ups or religious dogma?
I am not saying that it is healthy or right, but I do not think it is society/goverment's place to criminalise such behaviour and even censor information about it.
That to me, seems exactly the same as criminalising homosexuality.
In terms of literature about holocaust denial, it would be extremely ironic if these were criminalised considering the whole deal with fascism and book burning. There must always be freedom of information.