Can anyone clarify to me, the uninvolved, what exactly LCC's stance on cycling is?
I seem to recall when I've asked before is that LCC effectively had a vote where you had to choose between 'vehicular'/fast cycling in the road or dutch style tootling on segregated cycle paths, LCC chose the latter and now anyone else should GTFO and anyone who tries to proffer up any other attitude will get harassed and shot down by LCC members.
Is this truly the case? And if so, what affect is this going to have on cycling in the city if the main campaigners have agressively created and are enforcing a fracture within cycling? And is there anything that can be done about it?
Can anyone clarify to me, the uninvolved, what exactly LCC's stance on cycling is?
I seem to recall when I've asked before is that LCC effectively had a vote where you had to choose between 'vehicular'/fast cycling in the road or dutch style tootling on segregated cycle paths, LCC chose the latter and now anyone else should GTFO and anyone who tries to proffer up any other attitude will get harassed and shot down by LCC members.
Is this truly the case? And if so, what affect is this going to have on cycling in the city if the main campaigners have agressively created and are enforcing a fracture within cycling? And is there anything that can be done about it?