But I don't understand how the "surprise" cyclists aren't an admission of guilt... if she couldn't see the road ahead, how could she overtake safely and legally?
And if I were in the jury it is her admission she hadn't seen them that I'd have used to try to convince the other jurors to convict.
She didn't see the gap and judge it wide enough to fit through, she wasn't paying sufficient attention to see the cyclists. That's careless in my book.
And if I were in the jury it is her admission she hadn't seen them that I'd have used to try to convince the other jurors to convict.
She didn't see the gap and judge it wide enough to fit through, she wasn't paying sufficient attention to see the cyclists. That's careless in my book.