Its test match cricket - the entertainment can come from a great defensive display in not losing a match. Are you the type of football fan who likes lots of goals but cannot appreciate a great defensive display where the plucky away side gets a well-deserved 0-0 against a side with much better players?
In many ways it was good for them to go for the win. As a England supporter I was happy that I got to watch a day of slogging and the chance of and England victory, but it is not the Australian captains job to entertain me and give England achance of victory. I am not sure how Aussie fans are reacting, and as I said there is something to be said for attacking like they did, but snatching defeat out of the jaws of a draw (and moral victory) would not have been clever at all.
It was a shame about the light, and perhaps the rules need looking at,
.
Austrailia had to back them selves to get the wickets and go for the win, and clark obviously belived they could do it, its a ballance of runs vs time. admitedly i think they could have stuck another 30/40 on the total. Also i think that The win meant far more to Oz than getting a draw so they had to go for it. it would have been such a moral boost for the team looking to the winter Ashes.
Clark was not looking to entertain but to win and out of that come entertainment
Austrailia had to back them selves to get the wickets and go for the win, and clark obviously belived they could do it, its a ballance of runs vs time. admitedly i think they could have stuck another 30/40 on the total. Also i think that The win meant far more to Oz than getting a draw so they had to go for it. it would have been such a moral boost for the team looking to the winter Ashes.
Clark was not looking to entertain but to win and out of that come entertainment