You are reading a single comment by @Uoeno and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
@Uoeno
My own opinion; I used to run 46/16 and it was fine, quite the all rounder tbh. Good at accelerating and maintaining top speed but there was a lack of skid patches. (Not a problem if you don't skid a lot). I am now running 48/16 and it is slightly slower at accelerating but maintaining top speed is much easier. The only downside I could think of this gear ratio is the severe lack in skid patches amd the fact that if you want tp go for a gentle cruise you might end up putting some work to get the bike going. (Just my experience, my legs could be weaker than yours) From both gear ratio experiences; I think 48/17 would be the better ratio that combines both quick acceleration and maintaining speed without spinning too much. And plus you get more skid patches. #JustMy2P's