If this refers to my post I would like to make it clear that I am not suggesting strict liability, just something along the lines of: a motorist would have to show some evidence that he was not at fault.
Just move a little bit away from a mere balance of probabilities in civil actions (that is, for example, negligence).
I think the main benefit to us would arise from the propaganda element (which would need frequent advertising).
As to enforcing regulations, I believe the last Labour government created over 3,000 new criminal offences, but we now have less enforcement than ever.
If this refers to my post I would like to make it clear that I am not suggesting strict liability, just something along the lines of: a motorist would have to show some evidence that he was not at fault.
Just move a little bit away from a mere balance of probabilities in civil actions (that is, for example, negligence).
I think the main benefit to us would arise from the propaganda element (which would need frequent advertising).
As to enforcing regulations, I believe the last Labour government created over 3,000 new criminal offences, but we now have less enforcement than ever.